Bitcoin Tech Talk

There's literally nothing related to Bitcoin, much less its tech, it is all just politics and religion.

The trains are magnetic, like the high quality Chinese ones, now you have to figure out how magnets work.

You can also find this post in my Substack.

Keep the fear mongering and someday your wish of CP getting on-chain will become true.

2 years of fee pressure, the consolidation of the ordinals market, the acceptance amongst developers that arbitrary data can't be stopped.

Lost of things have happened since then.

Then don't run a node, CSAM has been with us since 2018, and possibly earlier.

Care to explain what you meant and where I failed to understand it?
English isn't my first language, so I you'd get that me reading comprehension is not the best when it comes to it sometimes.

I thought you meant that you hoped Knots never gets out of consensus.

When Weekly and Pussomo where trying to cancel achow for being trans and they were saying that we shouldn't trust Core for having trans code, this was related to the blocklist stuff because changing the word was woke, and the woke mind virus, and whatever buzzwords to get people angry.

Don't come crying when Luke introduces a consensus bug and you are out of the chain.

People have been warning about this for years, with not just Knots, but any alternative client as we don't have an independent consensus library, because nobody is funding the development to get it.

You can also read the article and see that there's proof that code merged into Core has been reintroduced to Knots with changes, and there's no practical way to follow through those changes other than going line by line.

Also you can read in the conclusion, that it quite literally says:

Is bringing up Luke's security failures and eccentricities an ad hominem? I wish to be clear that while I disagree with Luke on a great many things, I support his right to say and do them. Unless he tries to put me in jail for raping his node, of course. I'd suggest we not cross that particular Rubicon.

But if we're looking at Luke through the lens of evaluating him for a leadership role in an open source project of immense global importance, as the sole maintainer of Knots I think it's quite relevant to consider his history and personal characteristics.

But nah, better just say "they are attacking my favourite bad actor, I will ignore this post, no matter the amount of proof that he is a bad actor".

Nah, I'm just not discussing this stuff, you read the proof, you make your own opinion, my opinion is that Luke is and has been a bad actor.

If you want to lose your time defending it, good luck.

It's cool that you are this open about your mental illness.

I did stop them from posting to their audiences that Lopp is a shitcoiner and Luke is a good actor, didn't I?

Blacklist was the best drama just because of this banger meme

Ah fuck, I just reloaded the page, too late.

inb4 "I don't trust Lopp so I won't read this and will ignore all proof that Luke is absolutely fucking nuts and should not be trusted"

Always has been, now we just have an archive of all of Luke's terrible opinions and practices.

If you are choosing to ignore the proof because you consider it character assassination, I don't know what to tell you.

Nope, he doesn't he just said what you wanted to hear.

Consensus is not changing and that's the only thing limiting the size of op_retun.