pull down to refresh
112 sats \ 1 reply \ @o OP 9 Mar \ parent \ on: panopticon: Monitor Bitcoin Addresses Privately bitcoin
- When checking for new transactions, the app reaches your own electrum server. There's no third party server involved.
- The notification is "local," that is, it's not sent over Google/Apple's notification systems.
Good idea. I suppose I could use the ZMQ interface. I like your XMPP suggestion too, thanks. Still nothing off the shelf but hopefully I can wrap this up into some sort of reusable unit that I can share with others.
I don't understand why in the table of definitions at the top, the definitions of "deficient" and "wanting" reference "community support".
It seems like you're crossing the beams. I'd expect this evaluation to be based solely on each proposal's technical merits, which in turn would then help drive consensus. Having it contain this recursive metric of community support seems unproductive.
Also, some labels reference community support and others don't, so the scale is internally inconsistent.
a value Alice may reveal to Bob if she wants to revoke her ability to safely receive money in an address containing the top script.
I'm missing something. Can you please explain the above? I don't understand why or when Alice would want to revoke her ability to safely receive money. Folks tend to want to acquire and maintain the ability to safely receive money - the more the better.
Yeah you're right. I think MPC will solve this. Makes the transaction look like a single sig which is smaller.