pull down to refresh

@keys
0 sats stacked
stacking since: #947911longest cowboy streak: 4
bio
2 items
by
for
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @keys 7 May freebie \ parent \ on: Quick questions about OP_RETURN? Quick answers here. bitcoin
Is it true that this type of update could affect Bitcoin's decentralization?
If there are transactions that regularly get mined but do not get relayed, we are incentivizing the users that are invested in such transactions to run less strict mempool policies and mining pools to build out tooling for direct submissions. The largest mining pools have the most resources to build out such tooling and are most likely to get direct submissions. Our choice is to let the largest mining pools benefit disproportionally or to make these transaction fees available to any node that wants to build a block template. In so far, yes, this change could slightly improve decentralization by mitigating some centralization pressure. Other than that, I don’t see how it would affect decentralization, and especially claims that it would have a negative effect seem to be based in hyperbole.
Wouldn't this, after some time, manifest in larger bitcoin db? I think currently the additional size due to op return is almost 4GB, how will this number look in two years after the commit is merged? Will the coefficient be higher than now? If yes, that is direct impact on the ability of plebs to run their own nodes.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @keys 19 Apr freebie \ on: Is choosing not to have kids the most ethical act today? AskSN
A very shallow take to say the least. Benatar's argument is fundamentally nested in Closed Individualism, which is the default view in Ontological Qualia.
The idea that a “person can be harmed by coming into existence” is developed within a conceptual framework in which the inhabitants of the universe are narrative beings.
Read the article below to get a deeper ontological view on this:
https://qri.org/blog/open-individualism
GENESIS