pull down to refresh

okay, so ... there are certainly many ways to look at this situation. And for those who are very much in favor of participating in the legislator calling efforts, I don't dispute the value of participation in the political process, and in fact (at a local level) I encourage it.
this sudden rush to promote the Act reminds me of the push to protect Net Neutrality (remember when wikipedia & google & all the rest tried to convince us that net-neutrality was great, the first time) or the BLM movement when we were all supposed to put a black square up on our instagram.
To me, it smells.. and right after the convention, too
Nobody is saying "go read this and see if you support it", or even "ask the AI to summarize the points of the bill, and think about whether you support it".
Instead, it's just "GO DO THIS THING IT IS SO IMPORTANT AND YOU MUST ACT NOW TO PROTEC". This is not thoughtful, or encouraging.
it seems to me that unless and until the US goes back to small, comprehensible bills, there's no way that this Act gets addressed individually. Which means that this bill gets tossed into the mess with the current Big Beautiful Spending Cap Removal, or the next Bigger Beautifuller Political Pile of Compromise.
Seemingly out of nowhere, the podcast side of the industry is pushing hard. And they're all just telling me to call my senator. Everybody is suggesting (indirectly) that the best course of action is for me to follow their recommendations.
That's not the right to behave for me. And I think we would be better served if more people thought adversarially.
as an aside, I've never seen so many "Outlawed" spambot comments on a post. this to me is further indication that there's something hairy about the discussion:
here's the website everybody is using to promote it: https://saveourwallets.org
Here's a few screen caps of my discussion with an LLM:
The bill is like 3x shorter, with all of it definitions, than your LLM output.
reply
Anyway, don't call your senators if you don't want.
I've read the bill. It's dead simple. If something like this doesn't get passed, bitcoin developers are at risk of going to prison for developing software for you (eg this law would absolve the samourai developers), and when some of them do go to prison, very few will continue to develop such software.
If you think that's okay, or if you simply just don't want to bother, don't call.
reply
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @mo 5 Jun
going to prison for developing software
wrong, they will go to prison because they continue to believe they are a legal person... a citizen.
This rise on me a question: should bitcoin maintainers be and stay anonymous, like Satoshi was? full on cypherpunks? what would be the implications?
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 6 Jun
they will go to prison because they continue to believe they are a legal person... a citizen.
the FBI sure hates that one simple trick
should bitcoin maintainers be and stay anonymous, like Satoshi was?
and disappear like Satoshi did?
reply
105 sats \ 0 replies \ @mo 6 Jun
the FBI sure hates that one simple trick
the FBI inc. hate like it because is another way to make another commercial offer (going to jail) when one isn't ready to decline, or does not know how. Use words properly and you'll be fine.
and disappear like Satoshi did?
yes, because ego is a trap. Do you see any downside on Satoshi disappearance?
reply
"legal person" means a paper with a name on it. That name they try to make you believe it is you, the living man. That legal person they try to put in jail. That's the trick many people fall for it and they say that are the legal person. They literally declare themselves dead bodies. Then the state can do whatever they want with them... are just dead bodies, vessels without soul.
reply
should bitcoin maintainers be and stay anonymous
i'd recommend that anyone doing stuff in or around bitcoin do this.
reply
you're right. and I tend to think it's an improvement over the current regulatory un-certainty.
reply
I was also outlawed, look at this comment: #997653
reply
maybe this is the 'downvote'?
reply
statists doesn't like rebels
reply