pull down to refresh

It was the first time in Arizona judicial history — and possibly nationwide — that AI has been used to create a deceased victim’s own impact statement.
Pelkey’s sister and brother-in-law used the technology to recreate his image and voice likeness to “talk” to the courtroom about his life and the day he met Gabriel Paul Horcasitas, who shot him during a confrontation near Gilbert and Germann roads.
The state asked for a 9.5-year sentence, and the judge ended up giving Horcasitas 10.5 years for manslaughter, after being so moved by the powerful video, family says. The judge even referred to the video in his closing sentencing statements.
Straight out of Black Mirror, and just as awful (and unnecessary; if the judge needed to hear from an AI, he's not a good judge).
reply
I don't like this. No sir not one bit.
reply
I like the forgiveness but I don't like the way people frame the fake video. Its not the man. We don't know the man. I support freedom so if these people wanna do this cool for them but I reject the idea that this is "his words".
Edit: I would like to see/hear what the family said. They can speak for themselves. I would never want my family to do something like this. Its like paying an impersonator to say words my family would think I would say.
I've seen some people use ChatGPT to write prayers. It can write great "sounding" prayers. But they have no heart. There is no person with emotion and feeling behind it. Its no different than a sociopath hypocrite praying.
The more AI is used the more there will be a backlash and desire for real things. That's gonna be the swing back.
reply
18 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 18h
Yet another example of a culture based in lies
reply