Core70.6%
Knots17.6%
Other (btcd, libbitcoin, bcoin, etc)2.0%
None9.8%
51 votes \ 2h left
pull down to refresh
211 sats \ 3 replies \ @2ff79b9da4 21h
I’ve got both but after the recent debates I’m starting to lean to just running core
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @sudonaka 18h
interesting, what makes you think that adding more room for spam in op_return will stop them from using the cheaper witness data?
btw, the "bloat" is currently 11gb. so not a big deal in my opinion as people start to switch from 1tb harddrive to 2tb for storage.
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @2ff79b9da4 18h
inscriptions aren’t going away. Without a change in incentives people will continue using the cheapest option. My opinion shift is coming from low adoption of op_return filters, the past couple of years. Without larger adoption (mainly by miners) individuals running knots wont make a difference other than delaying block relay and slowing their own nodes.
Bloat may not be a problem now but in future years, I worry the requirements to sync a full node will increase and deter new node runners.
I don’t agree with or like inscriptions but knots isn’t going to stop them.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Filiprogrammer 2m
Storage is not the problem. The problem is that the UTXO set no longer fits into memory on low-end systems. Thus slowing down the node since it has to access the disk more often now.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @purpurato 15h
Running one with BTCPayServer, would like to have the option to use Knots.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 17h
CORE
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 17h
Core
reply