100 is too hot to be outside for more than a few minutes, and it's around the hottest you can expect it to get during a year in most regions, with few exceptions.
0 is too cold to be outside more than a few minutes, no matter how many layers you put on. It's also about the coldest you can reasonably expect it to get during a year.
80 is 80% hot, and so on.
On your home thermostat, there's a slighter difference between a single degree higher or lower. In Celsius a single degree is almost two whole degrees in Fahrenheit, so F is much more granular.
Normal human body temperature is 98.6. So if it's over 100, it might be something to worry about.
If I were to steel man the Celsius scale, I'd say:
At 0 you can expect snow and ice on the roads.
You set your refrigerator and freezer temperatures to just above and below 0, respectively.
I agree on 100 being a more human scale but 32 seems arbitrary. I can’t help but wonder why did Dr. Fahrenheit pick 32 instead of 0 for freezing point of water.
I’m looking for a temp scale that uses 0 as freezing point of water but 100 Fahrenheit because that’s reasonably hot for humans.
I guess I'm a 'Blue zone' maxi. I've deliberately gone out of my way to find a place where my family has access to clean food, and water.
Environmental issues - I'm a maxi for awareness of the damage invasive species can/will do. Near where I live there are signs up warning of Gold Clam, which is an invasive species that can really fuck shit up here. Can't be complacent about this shit.
Other hills I'm willing to die on: full drug legalization, anti violence - particularly physical violence, and life long, access to free education for all.
A nice person won't tell you that you have a bugger on your face. They wouldn't want to embarrass you and its easy to say nothing.
A kind person will take you aside and say something like, "you have something on your face".
Kindness is doing what is best for the other person. Being nice is easier. I try to apply this.
The other option is to be a jerk. "Hey, you have crap on your face!" It may be true but it isn't kind or nice. The world would be a better place if we had more kindness, less niceness and a lot less rudeness.
I think differentiating between kindness and niceness like this confuses the point more than defines an outcome. I prefer the understanding “love thy neighbor” as being “truthful, honest and impartial.” Ascribing an ideal emotional outcome on the part of the recipient may always result in a capacity to withhold information; if you make the idea to always avoid possibly inflicting pain on yourself a reality, you could avoid even trying to scratch an itch that might bring immense relief.
kindness and niceness like this confuses the point more than defines an outcome.
Different communication for different people. I've used this example for years and people seem to get it immediately. Could be a cultural thing as to why people get it.
At the root for me its about love. If you care about others you will think of what is best for them and that isn't always comfortable for you or them. When you are a parent you should learn this. You often have to do things your children will not like or appreciate for many years sometimes. Its much more comfortable in the short run to just be a yes man.
earth, rocks, minerals - besides climbing rocks, walking on earth barefoot, and drinking mineral water, it wud be a great idea to cook and store food in natural clay pots, so that minerals can seep into the food. i am not a rock maxi yet, but i wish to be one day.
Coffee