🎲 DiceLN.com Relaunch: Lightning-Fast, Provably Fair Dice Gaming! ⚡ \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

🎲 DiceLN.com Relaunch: Lightning-Fast, Provably Fair Dice Gaming! ⚡

343 sats \ 18 comments \ @LNPLEB 16 Apr bitcoin

Hey everyone! 👋

We’ve rebuilt DiceLN.com– the ultimate provably fair Lightning Network dice game where speed, transparency, and fun collide! Now a sleek Progressive Web App powered by Next.js & React, enjoy seamless, low-fee gaming with Bitcoin’s Lightning Network. 🎲⚡

🔹 Provably Fair – Verify every roll with cryptographic proofs! 🔹 Instant Transactions – Deposits & withdrawals in seconds. 🔹 New Rewards – Earn bonuses as you play! 🔹 Autobetting – Set your strategy and roll automatically. 🔹 Zero KYC – Quick signup, start playing in seconds. 🔹 Community – Play anywhere, chat with players.

Would love for you to check it out, roll some dice, and share your thoughts! 🚀🔥

🚀 Ready to Roll? Sign up now at DiceLN.com and join the Lightning Network dice revolution! 🎲⚡

💰 Exclusive Perks: Sign up, jump into the in-game chat, and you might score some free sats to play with (no begging, just vibe with us)!

🎁 Bonus Reward: Deposit sats, play a few rounds, and post an honest review on X, Reddit, or Stacker.News with a link included DiceLN.com. We’ll send you extra sats as a thank-you!

Don’t miss out – test your luck, have fun, and let us know what you think! 🚀🔥

view all related items

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @tenientedan 17 Apr freebie

👋

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @hybridbits 16 Apr freebie

I don't like this type of projects.

0 sats \ 13 replies \ @justin_shocknet 16 Apr

QA:

deposited 100 sats twice, only got credited once

inputs are a little borked, can enter values

Was thinking about justdice recently and how it deserved an LN version, glad to see someone else remembers it... a 1:1 clone would be epic

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @LNPLEB OP 16 Apr

Thanks for checking it out! I was inspired by other dice site which did not offer LN and wanted to make a niche proof of concept to show LN's power as a medium of exchange. Can you tell me which inputs are borked and allow entering values? I see the failed transaction, identified a bug i will credit you 100 sats and fix the bug shorty.

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @justin_shocknet 16 Apr

If I try to edit win chance it does some weird behavior I can't describe...

Amounts actually seem ok it may be that one updates the other I didn't realize before

If you weren't around for Just Dice it was legendary:

it had this compounding effect where people invested in the house so it could take bigger and bigger bets, the whale activity on there was insane https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rnsof/user_xyz2013_just_tried_to_double_his_016_btc/

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @LNPLEB OP 16 Apr

I think this is because there is minimum and maximum win-chance and it does not let you under above or below, were looking to increase this wincahnce range, and bet limit over time. for example minimum win-chance is 45.00% maximum is 53.00% to payout 1:1 use 49.00% default

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @justin_shocknet 16 Apr

If you try to type in 50 it'll get stuck at 45 seemingly no matter what you pre-select or where you enter the 5... but if the range is only 45-53 i think it might be better not to have it at all and just have 3 buttons.

I assume this is because you wouldn't want to offer 1% chance because then the house is paying 99x, but I'd think entering things like 1 or 99 would be the only reason to have the input as decimal field

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @LNPLEB OP 16 Apr

Yes your right because when you change the 45 to 50, its '55' temporarily and it does not let you enter this, i will try fixing this by adding a delay after you type this in so it gives you a second to enter the value you want.

reply on another page

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @LNPLEB OP 16 Apr

I remember Just-Dice, 999Dice and others from the good old days. im thinking of ways i can crowdsource bankroll to offer higher bet limits, or build it in a truly decentralized way.

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @justin_shocknet 16 Apr

failed to withdraw to a well-connected router too, the pay in node looks well connected so I assume its an internal error but the message was non-descript

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @LNPLEB OP 16 Apr

I credits you the 100 sats, you should now see it in your account > transcations If you have 304 try withdrawing 295-300 ish sats to cover ree / reserve

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @justin_shocknet 16 Apr

throws no_route now, but odd its pretty quick... doesnt feel like it has time to fail.. also should be an easy route: 0301c3924df01f1a376ab20ce9273ee2c4a1f2354c3400e6357d3d4144981ae728

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @LNPLEB OP 16 Apr

hmm, not sure why its failing to your node can you try using wallet of satoshi?

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @justin_shocknet 16 Apr

i let autobetter run wild, works good! withdraw problem solved that way ;)

view all 1 replies

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @LNPLEB OP 16 Apr

Please Try again, see notification about not withdrawing full balance for fees (just did successful withdraw to wallet of satoshi) if you continue to experience failures i can manually process the withdrawl

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 16 Apr

No lightning login?

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @LNPLEB OP 16 Apr

Working on this, unfortunately its not done yet.