pull down to refresh
related posts
0 new comment
229 sats \ 0 replies \ @rijndael 11 Nov 2022
Nothing says “the true bitcoin” like having a button for third parties to seize funds
reply
0 new comment
136 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 12 Nov 2022
Aka single participant consensus :)
reply
0 new comment
135 sats \ 1 reply \ @softsimon 12 Nov 2022
This is just a commit, does someone has link to the actual PR?
reply
0 new comment
75 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 12 Nov 2022
It’s just a commit. I made an assumption that they had a review process. My bad
reply
0 new comment
135 sats \ 0 replies \ @kilianbuhn 12 Nov 2022
How don't they get that making it more complicated = making it worse 😂
reply
0 new comment
135 sats \ 0 replies \ @shyfire 12 Nov 2022
My guess is they are aligning themselves with regulators
reply
0 new comment
135 sats \ 0 replies \ @orthzar 12 Nov 2022
inb4 the consensus rules for confiscation either (a) allows any UTXO to be confiscated by anyone, or (b) introduces an inflation bug.
reply
0 new comment
135 sats \ 0 replies \ @faxwmnhviomb 12 Nov 2022
What a shitcoin lol
reply
0 new comment
135 sats \ 0 replies \ @faithandcredit 12 Nov 2022
Its for the greater good?
reply
0 new comment
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @irusensei 12 Nov 2022
I’m guessing the idiot plans to claim the copy of satoshi funds under his already almost irrelevant clown chain and dump it on the remaining clowns to pay for litigations.
reply
0 new comment
255 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 13 Nov 2022
well, they shouldn't have a problem with it since according to BSV users, he is the real satoshi
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 11 Nov 2022
I was struggling to find the actual whitelist. Looks like its configuration defined?
reply
0 new comment