pull down to refresh

The European Union has rewritten its rulebook, scrapping the need for unanimous votes to push through resolutions. The move comes as Hungary digs in its heels, rejecting a $22 billion aid package for Ukraine. With Budapest’s dissent sidelined, the EU swiftly adapted, signaling a bold new era where consensus is optional.
Hungary’s Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó fired back, slamming the bloc’s “pro-war” tilt. “We won’t be dragged into this,” he posted online. “Hungarian taxpayers’ cash won’t fund weapons for Ukraine. Peace talks, not escalation, are the answer.” He also pointed to a U.S.-backed ceasefire offer that Kyiv famously snubbed.
Meanwhile, Nordic and Baltic nations—Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—are pushing hard for Ukraine’s fast-tracked EU membership, demanding “tangible steps” to seal the deal. Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen is bullish, eyeing Ukraine’s entry before 2030, with perks like duty-free trade already on Kyiv’s wish list, potentially rattling existing members.
But cracks are widening. The EU’s core flaw—its design as a political vanity project, not a cohesive economic engine—is biting back. Centralized power in Brussels has long choked member states’ autonomy, and Hungary, led by Viktor Orbán, is the loudest rebel. Defiant on immigration, energy, and ties with Russia and China, Budapest prioritizes its own survival over EU dogma. Yet, Brussels’ unelected elite can still steamroll elected leaders like Orbán, exposing the union’s democratic deficit—and its original intent.
this territory is moderated
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @KYC 25 Mar
Look, the EU changing the rules to ditch unanimity is a clear sign they’re done waiting for countries like Hungary to hold things up. Makes sense—they want to move fast with the war going on. But at the same time, this just highlights a big EU problem: how much say do member states really have if they can just be ignored when it’s inconvenient?
Hungary, as usual, is pushing back, and they’re not wrong about sovereignty. Brussels wants more control without dealing with opposition, and that’s causing friction. Orbán is controversial, but he represents a chunk of Europe that doesn’t want to blindly follow EU mandates.
In the end, the EU is at a crossroads: either become a faster, more centralized bloc at the cost of democracy or stay bogged down in internal disputes. They’ve clearly picked the first option, which might work for now, but could backfire in the long run. The EU already has cracks, and sidelining certain countries might just make them worse.
reply
They are done economically. Ethically Brussels is a bunch of commies and parasites.
reply