pull down to refresh

The article reads like pro plan AI-generated ethereum FUD (yay). But TIL ethereum lacks native multisig:
Bitcoin’s design includes built-in scripting commands for multisig transactions. Ethereum does not offer a direct equivalent, so you must write a contract that handles multiple signatures, tracks the current state on-chain, and updates each time a signature is added. This approach makes audits more difficult and increases the likelihood of bugs.
Hmm, it's a bit over my head, but does this factor into the OP_CAT debate? I imagine the security tradeoffs are similar.
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 8h
There's a related argument against OP_CAT and covenants for sure. The more expressive a (scripting) language is the harder it is to verify what it does.
reply