pull down to refresh

Including the claim of the negative. "there is no god" ? People throughout time have imagined Gods, angels, or demons- what is this new claim that nothing spiritual is real?
Science only needs one miracle: the moment of creation, the "big bang" Not to mention the "dark matter" that no one can explain.
Nope, one does not need to defend the negative.
I don't have to defend a claim that there aren't rainbow colored unicorns that piss from the sky causing rain. I don't have to defend the claim that there isn't a fat cookie loving guy who rides reindeer once a year sliding down chimneys dropping off presents to children.
You must prove your affirmative, extraordinary claim. The burden of proof lies with him who asserts something. If you assert there is a god, prove it.
I can simply say, I see no proof of such a god existing so I don't believe he/she/it/they exist, just like the unicorns and santa claus. Bring me the proof and then lets talk.
reply
The proof is the reality you see around yourself. The origin of this reality is God.
The burden of proof is on you to redefine what this creation force is, then it is simple semantics to pet your own ego.
reply
Nope. I and you see/experience reality around us. There is no god in that reality.
Now, if there was a bearded man walking around doing magic like jesus, then the burden of proof would be on me to provide an alternative explanation to magic.
But I see reality, not magic. You claim there is magic. Prove the magic.
reply
Miracle/magic/big bang/quantum mechanics
Midwit Semantics
God is the truth and the evidence for him is all around us. I will pray for you.
reply
When you make a big claim, of magic, you need big evidence to back it up.
Instead you want everyone to disprove your fairy tales. Laughable. Save your prayers for someone who cares for them.
reply
big evidence is literally the world around you brother. how did it come to exist?