pull down to refresh
42 sats \ 6 replies \ @Murch 22 Feb \ parent \ on: Are humans responsible for climate change? To what degree? AskSN
It seems silly to me to reject the scientific consensus on basis of a cherry-picked sensationally phrased prediction in a newspaper article from 36 years ago not having come to pass. If you read the rest of the article, you see the desertification and droughts right there mentioned next to it.
If you read the rest of the article, you see the desertification and droughts right there mentioned next to it.
Yes, I read the part of the article where the UN's claimed there would be "dust bowl like conditions", which was falsified as well. My point remains untouched: Why didn't you mention the benefits of a warmer planet? If you can't defend the UN's falsified hypothesis, then you should at least steelman how humanity gains from a warmer climate.
reply
reply
You said the UN's science is "directionally correct", how would you know if you didn't even look in the other direction? Clearly, the UN's predictions about global warming was proven false, so it's worth looking into the ACTUAL results that came from performing the scientific method.
reply
Temperatures have been rising as predicted. Desertification has been progressing as predicted. Ocean levels have been rising as predicted. More people have been dying due to extreme heat events. Storms, hurricanes, droughts, floods, extreme weather swings, and wildfires have been increasing as predicted.
You claim that the increase in temperature is beneficial. You have not provided an argument or piece of evidence in what way that might be the case. You're making the extraordinary claim, it's on you to substantiate it.
reply
reply
I'm not making any claims, you are. The troubling part is that the claims you are making have already been proven false in real life:
Say someone came to you and said "If we raised the maximum block size of Bitcoin with a hard fork, that will give the network more utility and cause the price to increase."
This is at least a credible hypothesis. However, you don't have to rely on any future predictions when arguing against this person because this hypothetical hard fork event ALREADY HAPPENED. The outcome was already measured in real life and determined to be false.
More people have been dying due to extreme heat events. Storms, hurricanes, droughts, floods, extreme weather swings, and wildfires have been increasing as predicted.
This prediction did not match the real world outcome of humanity's expansion of carbon dioxide production:
^ Global warming cultists, like BCH/BSV cultists, will look at their chart going straight to zero and say "Yes! It's exactly like I predicted!"
Meanwhile, the real world lives on in prosperity because they chose to bet against these fanatics.