pull down to refresh

Keynote Lecture by Jesús Huerta de Soto at the 8th Conference on Austrian Economics, Madrid, August 2, 2024
Introduction: The Emergence of a New Science that Revolutionizes Humanity
Economics is the youngest of all sciences and has been a major milestone in the history of Mankind. For the first time, Economics has shown how voluntary social cooperation free from institutional and systematic coercion creates a spontaneous order of prosperity and civilization which no one has designed or organized. Economics is the science of human interaction and has been expanded into a complete theory of liberty, understood as the most fundamental characteristic of human nature. Liberty means that every human interaction takes place voluntarily; that is, without any outside coercion or violence systematically imposed from above by the small group of human beings who exercise the political power.
The essence of this new science, Economics, is revolutionary. For the first time in the history of Mankind, it has been scientifically demonstrated that the state, in any of its forms, is unnecessary. It has been shown that society, understood as the process of voluntary human interactions, does not need anyone to govern it, because it spontaneously organizes itself. It has been shown that it is impossible to coordinate society based on coercive commands emanating from the state, and that any attempt to do so is doomed to failure causing violence and conflicts.
Economic Science also dismantles Thomas Hobbes: The “state of nature” was not an inevitable and dreadful situation, nor was there a “social contract” to keep order and guarantee peace. On the contrary, natural evolution has consisted precisely of the spontaneous and voluntary emergence of trade, while at the same time, states appeared as coercive institutions composed of the most antisocial, violent human beings, who wished (and wish) to live by plundering productive citizens (Oppenheimer 1926). Thus, Economics, as a new science, shows that what Étienne de La Boétie termed “voluntary servitude” is an anti-human aberration to which human beings have been subjected since time immemorial. In other words, for the first time in History, Economic Science has opened the eyes of Mankind: There is no need to go on following the custom of obeying the state; nor do governments have actually any superior prestige (indeed, they are literally devoid of any intellectually or morally superior attribute); nor are the establishment of politicians untouchable; nor must we allow ourselves to be bought, seduced, and deceived by the subsidies or perks intended to gain the loyalty of exploited human beings so they will voluntarily consent to being plundered (de La Boétie 2008). ……..
And now, to conclude: Will it be possible to dismantle the State with the teachings of true Economics? That is the great current challenge facing our Economic Science: to shake off the reactionary counterrevolution which insists on maintaining and justifying, the coercive, systematic, and monopolistic power of states and their governments; and to open up, once and for all, every area of society to voluntary cooperation and human interaction based on liberty. Even Justice, “public” order, and the prevention, suppression, and punishment of crime are to be provided by market processes based on voluntary cooperation. To scientifically demonstrate that this strategic objective is not only possible but also very useful for advancing civilization and the growing number and limitless well-being of people, is the great challenge before our Science. And our Science will continue to move forward only if it culminates its initial Great Discovery on the creative, coordinating effects of the spontaneous market order. Due to their complexity, these effects cannot be imagined, designed, or directed from above based on coercive commands from those with political power. Furthermore, the study of the most suitable transition, in each case and historical circumstance, to the proposed ideal system based on complete liberty from the state is another of the great, unavoidable challenges facing our Science at the present time. The transition must rest both on the avoidance of sudden regulatory vacuums and on the privatization and gradual, continuous, and specific dismantling (”piecemeal social deregulation”) of the entire framework of statist interventionism that today frustrates the free processes of voluntary cooperation. In short, the definitive triumph in the war of Economic Science against the “cultural statism” that today corrupts and confines it will become clear only with (first) the complete theoretical formulation and (later) practical realization of the libertarian ideal of an anarchocapitalist system. It is certain that only if we manage to culminate this ambitious scientific program will it become possible for the future of Humanity to expand exponentially, with a prosperity that today, due to its magnitude and complexity, we cannot even imagine.
This guy makes no bones about it, FTS. He posits both strategy and tactics to take down the state and all of its cronies, court economists and leaders. His idea is to crush them with voluntarism, which leads to wealth for all people involved in the voluntary economy of the free market. He tears down all the possibilities that the pseudoscientific, statist theories of controlling the markets and shows how they lead to nothing but impoverishment. This article was given as a speech!! FTS
As with Bitcoin, it's important to remember how early we are and how revolutionary the insights of economics are.
There's a great quote from Milton Friedman (that I couldn't find) about how even if all that has been accomplished by the sum total of economic work was reducing tariffs by 0.1%, then our entire profession has paid for itself many times over.
There's still a lot to do, but the world does appreciate markets and free exchange more than it used to.
reply
I just posted a speech by an Austrian that puts Friedman into his proper place in the world of Economic science, at least in the view of the lecturer: #862635 He says that Friedman was a thorough statist, although, as a “useful innocent” (a Mises quote).
The free markets will set people free, eventually. People can now see what free markets and voluntary arrangements can do for prosperity.
reply
Yeah, as a utilitarian, Friedman was only ever weakly attached to the cause of freedom. I don't think we should go out of our way to detract from or ignore the good he did, though.
reply
<scarcasm>OK, I think he did great when he promulgated the idea for withholding taxes during WWII. That was really a step forward for freedom and liberty! </scarcasm> He did do good after he took a step back and thought about what he had done in the past, though. I still can’t get past monetarism, though.
BTW, did you manage to read the whole speech? Amazing!!
reply
I haven't had time to read the whole thing.
I started reading through it and saw you had posted it, but then got distracted with other stuff.
reply
Yeah, I saw someone else had posted it when I was halfway through posting it and reading it to find the core nut. @Roll posted it about 13 minutes before I did but did his usual job on it, so I decided I had enough value added to post over him without compunctions.
The lecture was really amazing! It tore down mainstream economics in the best way possible and gave reasons why praxeology is the true economic science.
reply
There's a great quote from Milton Friedman (that I couldn't find) about how even if all that has been accomplished by the sum total of economic work was reducing tariffs by 0.1%, then our entire profession has paid for itself many times over.
Yeah but how much damage have we also caused with bad and half-baked ideas, lol.
reply
I can think of at least 100,000,000 people damaged by half-baked ideas that are still flowing through societies like viruses.
reply
Why you say we, Kimosabe? It was the state that did the damage with its half-baked ideas on interfering with the free markets. The state, not we.
reply
Presumably, because "we" are members of the profession.
reply
Ah… but did we promulgate these ideas or spread them? I only do Austrian school economics since I learned of it. I don’t think the Austrians are doing damage to anybody, especially Rothbard.
reply
A ton, but still probably not enough to offset the positives of say China or India even partially embracing market liberalization.
Are you familiar with some of the horrifically failed misadventures in development economics? They've got a fair amount to atone for.
reply
I was in India just when they started moving from their controlled economy to a freer market economy. There were adjustments and people grumbling, but the grumbling seemed to be about how some of the formerly price controlled goods were having rising prices, but were available. Like everything else, it hurt some people and helped others. That was when the Indian economy started to break out.
reply
Are you familiar with some of the horrifically failed misadventures in development economics? They've got a fair amount to atone for.
Haha, no. Got a list somewhere? I'd love to bookmark it
reply
It's been a while since I took my development courses, but the ones I can remember would probably make a decent post.
reply
Perhaps the largest mistake would have been state directed development. MITI in Japan directed industrial and trade development until their big blow-up in the late 80’s. Since then, there has been a constant slump and drain on the Japanese economy, I think, due to that previous direction. The state was choosing the winners and losers, which, according to Mises in Bureaucracy is an egregious mistake because bureaucrats work to rule, not to efficiency and profit.
reply
As with Bitcoin, it's important to remember how early we are and how revolutionary the insights of economics are.
I think this only works with, as the author says, the Science of Economics, not the pseudoscience of the macroeconomists or the state-religion of Marxists. He was looking at what Austrian Economics or praxeology was doing for the science of economics.
There's still a lot to do, but the world does appreciate markets and free exchange more than it used to.
Yes, but most of the world is locked up in some other vision and/or version of economics. Until they see that the state is the problem and volunteerism is the solution, not much will happen. When the statists have the power and guns to coerce everybody else, they will get away with what they are doing. When that changes, everything will change.
reply
I still think the state or some form of it (don't yell at me libertarians, (coz I know you won't shoot me (non-aggression principle))) is needed to enforce property rights and some kind of moral order where we aren't just all robbing each other. But, yeah, beyond that it just makes most things worse.
I also think a state decoupled from natural law / transcendent moral principles is destined to result in tyranny. So there's that too.
reply
There are all kinds of thinking on DOAs that may ally your doubts about getting rid of the state and all of its miserable actions.
I also think a state decoupled from natural law / transcendent moral principles is destined to result in tyranny. So there's that too.
Yes, once they feel decoupled from natural law, they feel anything they do is OK by the Universe. Wrong again buckwheat! They will suffer the slings and arrows of justice, sooner or later. I think Bi-Den and Fraudci will be finding this truth out shortly.
reply