pull down to refresh
related posts
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @selfish_gene 24 Oct 2022
возможно они кредитные? или все государство войдёт в сферу через контроль сети? думаю что всегда получать приятнее чем долго хранить...
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @DeezSats 24 Oct 2022
This article has an optimistic conclusion 👍
reply
0 new comment
5 sats \ 5 replies \ @satorin 25 Oct 2022
Less than half the US-listed public miner hash-rate could be a favorable outcome, yes... I would add:
(1) How these companies are listed (SPAC, or even direct listing) could affect future ability to raise funds.
(2) Furthermore, increasing reliance on debt is not really discussed (e.g. a sustainable level).
(3) Finally ,the merits of a public listing goes beyond just capital raise (e.g. disclosure of energy source), so it's probably too early to tell if it is better or worse to rely on public markets for the long-term sustainability of the Bitcoin mining industry.
Cheers :)
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @alpacachino 31 Oct 2022
https://www.accesswire.com/723009/Argo-Blockchain-PLC-Announces-StrategyCompanyOps-Update
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @alpacachino 28 Oct 2022
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1839341/000119312522270236/d395956d8k.htm
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @alpacachino 28 Oct 2022
$CORZ checked a few boxes there, good job.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DeezSats 25 Oct 2022
Public miners are regulatory compliant ie, pro-censorship. So it's better if they are less than half.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @satorin 26 Oct 2022
Gotchya, and agreed.
reply
0 new comment