pull down to refresh
11 sats \ 6 replies \ @supertestnet 26 Dec 2024 \ parent \ on: LNhance - A soft fork proposal for bitcoin bitcoin
I disagree. It would still have been worth doing Ark even if we never got taproot, because of the cheaper transactions. But no one thought of Ark til after taproot was a thing, so it's a moot point.
MAX_PUBKEYS_PER_MULTISIG = 20
reply
(1) 20 people sharing a utxo is a 10x improvement over lightning...especially when you pile on "there are no inbound capacity issues" and "every user can still 'send to' lightning invoices"
(2) it is perfectly valid and standard to do an m-of-67 in segwit v0 as explained by Pieter Wuille here
reply
If you don't have n-of-n, might as well be using fedi! Anyhow this is cringe and you are being pedantic for no good reason. Taproot made clArk practically viable to a certain scale where Ark might make sense at.
reply
If you don't have n-of-n, might as well be using fedi
You do. If you want a 67-of-67, just set m to 67
this is cringe and you are being pedantic for no good reason
I agree, but I'm having fun so that's a reason
Taproot made clArk practically viable to a certain scale where Ark might make sense at
IMO it would have made perfectly good sense even before taproot. But no one thought of it
reply
Ah you were talking about the CHECKSIG ADD thing. You might as well use CHECKSIGVERIFY for n-of-n.
reply
Good point. Doing so might allow you to fit another pubkey in the script, or maybe more than one, and make the n-of-n larger than a 67 of 67.
reply