People are staying crazy
pull down to refresh
148 sats \ 5 replies \ @freetx 19 Dec 2024
I would imagine thats some type of error in trying to compose his own transaction?
Looking at the address: 0xAC9B01895D2a6096DB382DD2f6aA5c2502956cD7 on etherscan.io it has about 10K in USDT in it.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 19 Dec 2024
Error for pay 8.5 BTC? Strange
reply
11 sats \ 3 replies \ @freetx 19 Dec 2024
If you try to compose a bitcoin transaction by hand (or via a script) and then broadcast it yourself.....bad things can happen....
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 19 Dec 2024
Exactly. That’s my point
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 19 Dec 2024
Could be the case where the script had been working fine, but had a bug...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 19 Dec 2024
Yes, depending of the software that this user/dev used. Maybe had some bug there possibly
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @shafemtol 20 Dec 2024
Ouch! Looks like they only considered the value of the first input (0.14213292 BTC) instead of the sum of all the inputs when calculating the change (0.04210876 BTC).
reply
127 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 19 Dec 2024
Update: The transaction was atomic swap transaction via Thorswap/Thorchain between BTC/USDT: https://x.com/mononautical/status/1869875248813797619
reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @clr 19 Dec 2024
This is a very expensive price to pay for shitcoining.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 19 Dec 2024 bot
https://xcancel.com/mononautical/status/1869875248813797619
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @itsrealfake 20 Dec 2024
who needs a security budget when u have fees this high?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @_b_o_n_e_s_ 20 Dec 2024
brah if you didn't really need your bitcoin send them to me I'll make good use of them
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BeeAye 20 Dec 2024
wowzers
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 20 Dec 2024
Lol I guess ordinals weren't supplimenting the security budget enough for someone so they took it upon themselves to fat finger pay foundry
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @xz 20 Dec 2024
I guess 91127x is suboptimal.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @asterisk32 20 Dec 2024
More like horrendous
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @xz 20 Dec 2024
.. but not if it were your own Bitaxe that solo-mined that block
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @rafael_xmr 19 Dec 2024
Anon makes a donation to miners
Just like giving a landlord a tip
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Skipper 19 Dec 2024
Lucky Foundry miners
reply