371 sats \ 3 replies \ @Satosora 22 Oct
They can at least be a bit more elegant about it.
"Kill Musk's Twitter"?
He owns it, its X now.
They are so behind the times.
reply
41 sats \ 2 replies \ @xz 22 Oct
It's a freudian slip. It reveals the desire to reclaim the coopting of public consensus through shadow banning, promoting state sanctioned media and socialist values. The evil mouthpiece before the CEO jumped ship.
reply
28 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 22 Oct
Just bitter and jealous.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @xz 22 Oct
Indeed.
reply
146 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 22 Oct
It's blindingly obvious that one side is afraid of speech and the other isn't...
reply
95 sats \ 0 replies \ @xz 22 Oct
"The new British government also believes that a Harris defeat would leave Starmer “alone”".
I hope that he is left alone. Perhaps on an island, far away.
reply
96 sats \ 0 replies \ @xz 22 Oct
It's so disgusting. Heaven forbid that the people want to have an uncensored voice and elect representitives that are their best shot at upholding the legal right to speak freely.
Shame on these politicians.
reply
71 sats \ 3 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 22 Oct
Why is anyone surprised that a Fabian socialist (communist, Marxist or whatever the flavor of the day is) would want strict censorship? It never fails, they do it every time. It is one of their signature actions. Another one is, unfortunately, forced declines in population due to lead poisoning and starvation. Eerily enough, Starmer and his gang have decided to use kill shots and invasion to settle the British problem.
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @xz 22 Oct
Pre-election, I remember hearing, 'oh you know, he's from a working class background, he held x position, he worked his way up'. For months leading up to the election, it was 'conservatives bad' on repeat 24/7. It's like temporal brainwashing throughout election season. Then people wake up again.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 22 Oct
Perhaps letting yourself snooze off during elections is a mistake. A way to avoid that would be to require people to register far in advance (6 months), present themselves with ID at a local polling station. I know that in the US, charging people a fee to vote is against previous Supreme Court rulings, but it is the same as SN and Substack charging money to either post or read. It discourages unmotivated people from voting.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 22 Oct
You have to own property to vote!
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @guts 22 Oct
Disgusting.
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @DEADBEEF 22 Oct
It is incredible watching western democracies throwing away their values and becoming tyrannical all in the name of saving democracy.
Just wait until they hear about Nostr.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @7e6e393a56 22 Oct
Would you like to know how? How will she use the state machine to break a multi billionaire with stakes within the American state
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bee_Aye 22 Oct
why she have British advisors? 😅
reply
28 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 22 Oct
Because it really is a globalist cabal
reply