I'm opposed to the state killing people in general, but in case like this, where even the lead detective from the case says they were wrong, it's impossible to read as anything other than an abomination and a bloodthirsty legal system.

I don't think that execution is any different than a life sentence. Rather a life sentence can be more torturing in many ways.

What utter BS: At trial, one nurse claimed she saw signs of sexual abuse in Nikki’s case, though no doctors or other medical professionals involved in Nikki’s care observed any such signs and testing from a sexual assault kit produced no substantiating evidence. The nurse, who presented herself as a “Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner” (SANE), was, in fact, not SANE-certified and offered her personal views on pedophiles in her testimony, further stoking prejudice against Mr. Roberson so the jury could see him, with no history of violence, as a person capable of violently shaking a child.

I guess The ScienceTM is only the science when it goes the way the state wishes. I have known for years that SBS and SIDs were a load of horse pucky. Both cases have been credibly attributed to vaccinations, just as colon cancer is attributed to polio vaccinations! I guess we will figure it out later rather than sooner. However, are we going to execute people over it? It looks to me like the case of the single innocent person out of thousands of guilty getting murdered by the state.

From what l know, the innocence projects pick their clients carefully. This will be something to watch carefully, since it could easily happen to one of us.

Wow. As a parent, my heart always bleeds when I hear of situations whereby not only is another parent dealing with the indescribable pain of losing a child but also potentially being unjustly punished for their death.