I would like to gamble on the US election results, prices of shitcoins going to zero , etc, not just on BTC mining. I am consistently good at it. The way I do it on polymarket but without the fear of loosing my purchasing power. I think polymarket should switch to BTC or to at least something like wrapped BTC in order to encourage more long term bets.
reply
We might have something for you that could be of interest! We definitely have a 2024 US Elections Market lined up. You can place bets on events like the US election results, and no need to worry about losing purchasing power—our platform is built on Bitcoin. Check it out, I just posted this last night: #690916.
reply
đź‘Ť
reply
Alright I am in. Put some sats on foundry. Tried to direct winnings to my SN wallet. Let's see if that works.
reply
I always said and I will repeat it over and over:
gambling with your sats is stupid, not reckless. It will come that day when you will regret it a lot.
reply
I get where you're coming from, but there's an important distinction between gambling and prediction market trading. Gambling is often a pure game of chance, where the odds are heavily stacked against the player, like rolling dice or spinning a wheel. There’s little to no room for analysis or informed decision-making.
Prediction markets, on the other hand, are more like intelligent trading. In these markets, you’re betting on real-world events, using research, insights, and analysis to make informed decisions. It’s about using your knowledge to assess probabilities and take calculated risks—similar to how traders analyze stocks or commodities.
For example, in a prediction market on the US election, you can weigh polling data, historical trends, and geopolitical factors before placing your bet. You’re not leaving it to chance; you’re making an informed prediction based on available information.
So, it’s not just gambling—it’s strategic trading where the goal is to outthink the market rather than just hoping for a lucky break.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @21e6 OP 4h
đź’Ż
reply