Why did OpenBazaar Fail and what could have been done better to make it succeed?
Great thread on this here: #38688
@brianhoffman even chimes in
reply
Here's a post from 2018 on HackerNews with an AMA:
OpenBazaar 2.0, powered by IPFS https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16702684
My opinion, ... OB needed a full capability mobile app and it needed a web front-end (to at least search and browse). It also needed something done so that performance using the client (browse, and search) wasn't so terribly slow. OB might have had a window, if it was a couple years earlier, where it might have found a user base (both vendors and consumers) that would have stuck with them while figuring out a solution after on-chain fees spiked.
But once there was the ability to accept bitcoin for payment on Shopify, and also when BTCPay Server came out, there was much less of a reason for vendors to sell on a marketplace like OB.
Vendors want buyers, and OB simply didn't result in any decent volume for the few vendors who tried. Without real vendors, generally the only vendors remaining using OB were doing so because they weren't welcome on eBay and Amazon. So you had a lot of weird stuff, which makes a curious normie get turned off from OB. So the catch-22 (few vendors resulted in few consumers, and few consumers resulted in few vendors) was never resolved.
Even today, there aren't really any bitcoin-related online marketplaces that are finding much traction anywhere.
Following is a copy pasta of the Marketplaces section of an article on my blog. Looks like I need to update that -- some of them are now defunct.
reply
Don't worry, the new version of openbazaar will be released in a few months.
reply
Like hundreds of early businesses focused on Bitcoin, mine included, OB's team fell for the classic trap of building on bitcoin while assuming that it was already a finished monetary network.
It wasn't. Not without lightning. Not only did the fees in 2016-2017 balloon up to make it unusable, but the blocktime confirmation delays made it unweildy for commerce. We DESPERATELY needed lightning but few fully realized that yet...
Sadly, Brian had a team full of altcoiners, expecially Chris Pacia, who was a Bcasher. Unable to wait for Lightning to take off, they went the route of optimizing for shitcoins and that made the entire bitcoin community exile the project.
Now that lightning is ready, we just need someone to pick this great project up and run with it: https://github.com/OpenBazaar
reply
Agree with this accounting.
There is limited, but definitely not zero, demand for this kind of thing. Towards the end of the project's lifetime they actually set up a mobile app, which is probably the last piece making it viable.
Whether it's viable as a business I'm not convinced at all, but as a protocol for casual p2p commerce it may well be, now we have a mature Lightning network (though it will emphatically only get used for niches here and there, not like it's going to replace Amazon et al.).
reply
It never could have been a viable business, even if there was more buyer & seller demand... That's the nature of decentralized markets.
But I still hold out hope that one day that code will be in use instead of dark markets after someone brushes it off and adds the Lightning Network & TOR by default to it.
reply
I remember how it started, it was initially developed by Amir Taaki, an anarchist, with the clear goal of becoming something like a decentralised Silk Road.
Getting it to run was quite an ordeal, the UX was horrible and never seemed to improve. Although it started as a Bitcoin only, they later added altcoin support and even decided to introduce their own coin.
In hindsight, I think it was one of these projects that fail, partially not because the idea is bad, but because they are too much ahead of their time, way before the market's ready. Someone might pick it up later, improve the product and the business model and make billions with it.
With Lightning now being functional, the project and business model need a new and fresh approach.
reply
It wasn't using Nostr.
reply
it required a dedicated desktop client and it is much easier to use a web browser (even tor browser) and directly access a darknet market
no one wants to install a dedicated client just to shop in a "decentralized manner"
everything needs to be browser accessible because changing behavior by asking users to install an app is unfortunately a big barrier to entry unless there is some other incentive at place. And for open bazaar besides for buying a bunch of garbage, only the ideological used it. There were no incentives to install the app. And no incentives to buy there vs ebay.
Incentives always beat ideology
reply
Just like with Bisq, the people who know what they're doing will not be using anything but a dedicated, open source P2P app. Their Haven phone app was never P2P so I never used it.
Of course this is a big barrier to adoption, so both routes needed to be developed.
reply
but it is open source so fork it and try again now that we have lightning
reply
I declare that OPenbazaar is still alive, but version 2.0 is hard to use, we are working on version 3.0. It will be released in November. https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenBazaar/comments/x4qy1y/the_demo_of_version_30/
reply
how is that going?
reply
It switched for using shitcoin.
reply
Cuz Brian hoffman was affiliated with shitcoiners 😛jk. Check out honeyroad.store pretty sure it uses lightning
reply
I believe many of the developers went the altcoin route. I don't think they ever made the UI very appealing either.
reply
+500 sats. Also interested to know.
reply