100 sats \ 2 replies \ @TNStacker 31 Jul
Was Bitcoin2024 even a Bitcoin conference?
reply
68 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 31 Jul
Hell yea, it's a target rich environment for maxi's that actually show up and put in the work
Complaining about shitcoiners from the basement doesn't achieve anything, got to go and fight for every inch of ground... I got dozens of new Uncle Jim Lightning nodes set up and saved several people from scams
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 31 Jul
🎯🎯🎯
US people are so dumb...
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @03365d6a53 31 Jul
Bitcoin Atlantis was Bitcoin Only
Exactly how it should be.
Embarassing to see "bitcoiners" at conferences eagerly whipping out their bank cards to beg for payments.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 31 Jul
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @clr 31 Jul
I saw that. I think we should wait to have more data from the BTCPay people or other sources, because those transactions were the ones where the merchants used the Strike API (to convert to fiat, I assume). Maybe there were more transactions that didn't use Strike. If that is the final data, it's really telling/discouraging about the kind of people that attended that conference.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 31 Jul
Why is this a public information?
IT SHOULD NOT BE !
reply
2 sats \ 3 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 31 Jul
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zF58HeXD3dsub0cv7e4KBM47CUNucfIasvgrn2wjLaA/edit?pli=1&gid=0#gid=0
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 31 Jul
WRONG, TOTALLY WRONG!
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Rsync25 OP 31 Jul
The sources are public. Why is wrong publish this data?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 31 Jul
because...
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @BlokchainB 31 Jul
How was this data aggregated? How many paid for their ticket in bitcoin? Would that not be counted? This data is skewed to make bitcoin magazine look bad
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @clr 31 Jul
AFAIK, the data for the other conferences doesn't include the ticket sales either, so the comparison would be fair. It includes the spending done during the conference (drinks, food, merchandise, books, etc.). The data for Adopting Bitcoin Arnhem includes also the payments made during the conference at the city merchants that use BitKassa.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 31 Jul
I have heard that Shitcoin Magazine did not organize the WiFi networks to support so many Bitcoin wallets and so many people using them at the same time.
Making it impossible to use them.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @BlokchainB 31 Jul
Yeah the conference did have net issues Jimmy song was complaining about it at the book signing table. So def a gaff on them but that is why I question this data.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Rsync25 OP 31 Jul
Official data source: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zF58HeXD3dsub0cv7e4KBM47CUNucfIasvgrn2wjLaA/edit?pli=1&gid=0#gid=0
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 31 Jul
Yeah it’s only using data from strike. Having gone to the conference and paid many vendors with bitcoin this data is skewed just as I mentioned before
reply