21 sats \ 20 replies \ @TomK OP 26 Jul \ parent \ on: EU Transfers €1.5 Billion in Seized Russian Assets to Support Ukraine's Defense news
It is terrible to see how the Europeans are trampling on trust in their own rule of law and international rules of the game, and in this way are jeopardizing any future with Russia for the time being.
in this way are jeopardizing any future with Russia for the time being.
Uhmm sir, did you forget that Russia invaded a sovereign European country in 21st century? Your response seems to lightheartedly ignore this fact.
reply
You seam to ignore all the Minsk Agreements.
You fail to realize both Merkel and Macron admitted they haven’t respected the agreements.
Are you also ignoring these facts?
reply
Minsk Agreements were forced by Russia in their interests when Ukraine was weaker than it is now.
reply
reply
Forced on Ukraine. Germany and France just wanted to not have war in Europe. They were fools. Now they start to admit that Poland and Baltics were right about Russia since forever. But we were called "russophobes" back then. Hmm, maybe millenia of history with wars against Moscow has teached us something?
reply
reply
Ok, I will not convince you, I know, you can continue living in your dream world.
And what Minsk agreements have to do with Zelensky?
reply
reply
I hope you at least get good rubles for your posts. Cheers and get real lol.
reply
do we really need to have this debate again? how many wars of aggression have NATO states, above all the UK and the USA, carried out since the end of the Second World War? please answer this first, then look at the historical background since the Maidan coup, the rearmament of the Ukrainian army into a NATO army and then think about it again, please. The problem here is that a lot of You guys do not see the geopilitical /ressource driven background of this. You do not understand how the military complex is working.
reply
reply
That's decision by IOC, not EU or USA. And banning aggressors is nothing new, see Yugoslavia 1992, for example. And Russia was first banned even not for aggression, but because of state-sponsored doping.
reply
this way are jeopardizing any future with Russia for the time being.
Russia in it's present form must be destroyed, it's empire of evil!
reply
reply
No, it's not. And good thing is that it's slowly collapsing since mid-19th century (Crimean War).
reply
reply
Russia was bigger and more influential in mid-19th century. Since then it has become smaller and smaller. Not straight line to bottom, as with financial markets, but trend is clear. Most important there isn't even territory or military failures, but demographics.
reply