Written by Richard Greaser
Washington, DC: A handful of members of congress have submitted a bill for comment in the US house of representatives for the United States to join Ukraine. While the bill appears to be contentious and if passed, would likely be struck down by the Supreme Court as being unconstitutional, there is a non zero chance it does get passed. Already, the various corporate tv news channels have instructed their viewers what to think about the topic with mostly positive coverage of the situation.
Part of the bill outlines that Dan Held would be sent to Ukraine as a military advisor. It would seem that he caught the attention in 2023 for his astute commentary on military strategy. While the Ukrainians did not follow his suggestions of using thermite to defeat the Russians, congress feels that with a new strategy organized by Held, the Ukrainians might be able to make some strategic progress for the first time during the war.
"What this is attempting to do is taking voting out the equation for providing support to Ukraine. If the US becomes a state of Ukraine, congress would be able to direct funding to them much more easily. In many ways this is a coup against the American people," Thomas Massie told the Bugle.
(The proposed new flag of the United States of Ukraine)
If passed, Volodymyr Zelensky would become the defacto president of the US, having access not only entirely to NATO, it's nuclear arsenal, but also the US budget and federal government. Depending on the timing of the vote, Donald Trump could be running against Zelensky instead of Biden. This could be a very lopsided election as congress has voted to send Zelensky 100s of billions of dollars for his reelection campaign.
Cynthia Lummis applauded the proposed bill saying, "This would be good for American security because if the US joins Ukraine, we could dollarize the country, paving the way for much easier ways for politicians to launder money through the war torn country. Putin has been great for us building our Non KYC stacks."
The FBI is closely watching dissenters against the bill and there has been a series of protests by individuals who feel this is unconstitutional. The FBI put out a PSA saying, "If you want to be noncompliant as a result of our noncompliance, you will get a boot on your neck, and it won't be pretty. We control everything and resistance is futile."
Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter have been reported to censor posts on the subjects at the behest of the FBI and other organizations.
What... What even is this? Thats not even how legislation works? We don't submit a bill for comment. Not to mention what does it even mean to submit one for comment? We submit them to various stakeholders and government departments/agencies for technical analysis but wtf is comment? Congress also doesn't have the ability to control the military like you are saying. This might be the wackiest off-the-wall thing I have seen.
reply
Oh it's nice to have a member of congress to comment on this situation. How are you going to vote on this bill?
reply
I am not a Member I am a staffer and this bill literally does not exist so I have no idea who told you it does but they either A are confused since we are voting on National Resources bills this week or B are just trying to make stuff up and spread disinfo.
Today's Legislation: These are all bundled together under one vote.
  1. H.R. 615 - Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act of 2023
  2. H.R. 2925 - Mining Regulatory Clarity Act of 2024
  3. H.R. 3195 - Superior National Forest Restoration Act
  4. H.R. 764 - Trust the Science Act
  5. H.R. 3397 - WEST Act of 2023
  6. H.R. 6285 - Alaska’s Right to Produce Act of 2023
  7. H.R. 6090 - Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023
These are a separate votes
  1. H.R. 3195 - Superior National Forest Restoration Act
  2. H.R. 764 - Trust the Science Act
  3. H.R. 615 - Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act
  4. H.R. 3397 - Western Economic Security Today Act
reply
Translation:
  • Trust what we say is the science, which is all a manipulation.
  • Restrictions on what you can hunt.
  • Don't go live in the forests, keep in the fucking cities where we can control you better.
  • Suck the ass of Israel.
What. A. Shame.
reply
Close bud but if you read the bills you would see that well its the opposite of what you said.
  • Trust the Science Act actually To require the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
ie allows you to shoot them
  • Not sure how protections for hunters stops hunting when it ya know does the opposite but again nice try
  • Forest Act clearly states To rescind Public Land Order 7917, to reinstate mineral leases and permits in the Superior National Forest, to ensure timely review of Mine Plans of Operations, and for other purposes.
ie allow mining and drilling and overturn the President's ban on these things.
Only takes a second to read but I get that it is hard.
reply
  • So if you remove the gray wolf is because you have a long list of other things you still have which you agree a gov should have competence over.
  • Protection of hunters really means regulating hunters, which shouldn't. Hunters don't need privileges or help, specially if the rest pay for them.
  • Minining permits? I am fully sovereign on what I can mine in my land. Why would I need a permission? And who is the alleged gov to say the public land is theirs to allow or disallow leases in the first place?
You see, the problem here is that you believe and submit to a ficticious authority and try to impose that believe on others. It doesn't matter if what the gov says coincides with what you want or not, because there will be a time in which it doesn't, and you will regret asking to them in the first place.
As @DarthCoin said, you are eating their shit. It doesn't matter if sometimes it is tasty shit, it is shit anyway.
reply
I absolutely love the social psych around the sovereign citizen movement! Tell me more about your beliefs cause they truly are one of a kind! One question though.... Say I mine on my land and fill it with mercury and it ends up poisoning your water... how does that work because with what you said I mined on my land and I did not directly access yours. Mother Nature did her thing and caused it so am I off scot-free while you have no more water?
reply
Natural Law:
You have the right to free use of your property and agreement with other beings, as long as it is voluntary and in full knowledge of the conditions and risks, and if not, you would be fairly responsible and liable to compensate them.
If I contaminate your land with my activities I am responsible and liable to compensate you fully. Is it that so difficult to understand?
I just assumed you were because you said "We don't submit a bill for comment." This appeared to be you claiming you were an elected official passing legislations.
Do the staffers usually have butt sex in the senate chambers before their congresspeople vote on bills that are non compliant with the constitution? How many times have you engaged in this activity?
reply
I hate to break it I only write the bills and submit them. I also work on the House-side and never travel over to the Senate. Also hate to break it to you I am not gay nor do I disrespect the buildings like that one individual did...
reply
Have you considered writing a bill for Congress and the CIA to become compliant institutions, barring their noncompliance?
Or do you think there needs to be constitutional amendments for them to become compliant because it's too difficult and restrictive now?
reply
Can you please submit a bill that makes it illegal to prosecute someone for laundering the CIA's money? You shouldn't be able to arrest people for that, in a Democracy
reply
I work in the Science and Technology space not the Financial Services space so I cannot sadly....
reply
I am not a Member I am a staffer
So you eat the same gov shit, right.
reply
Darth are you proud of my new bio? 110% inspired by your love and commitment to the hate!
reply
There's nothing more in this world to hate more than governments and especially those who work for a gov.
Than came banksters and shitcoiners. FUCK'EM'ALL
reply
Hey I am just saying by my existence here you have stacked hundreds if not thousands of sats by hating on me... You should love my existence since it is benefitting you so much!
reply
No, as a gov agent you are just a cockroach.
How do you justify working for a noncompliant organization who refuses to follow the rules?
reply
Its actually pretty easy. I am trying and working on legislation that changes that. One of the bills that passed the House last night I worked on does in fact do that. It's called H.R. 1069 - Clean Energy Demonstration Transparency Act of 2023.
reply
Have you considered submitting a constitutional amendment to remove the 4th amendment so they don't have to keep voting on renewing FISA?
This is all horseshit. I am wiping my ass with all that paper garbage.
reply
What have I read right now?
reply
Some stellar reporting on democracy
reply
so many layers of troll, i'm lost
reply
I have to say I do love how the hatred of me is driving this post to the top of the hot section lmao
reply
Yes it is all about you
reply
Ya welcome bud
reply