Pretty crazy to think about. No one thought it was possible a year ago.
Now here we are with absolute madness set to unleash tomorrow.
pull down to refresh
259 sats \ 7 replies \ @justin_shocknet 18 Apr
omni layer, counter party, colored coins...
time is a flat circle
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 19 Apr
Lol if you're in bitcoin long enough you get to experience groundhog day
reply
31 sats \ 0 replies \ @falsefaucet 18 Apr
time is circular fo sho
reply
10 sats \ 4 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 18 Apr
This time is different haha
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @falsefaucet 18 Apr
'This time is different'
ive heard that before
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 18 Apr
No it isn’t. Check yourself, before you wreck yourself.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr
Prepared to get rekt. Its all good.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 19 Apr
It’s not all good! It’s this ignorant, immature attitude toward srs bizness that really galls me.
Do you have forced closed channels that you cannot economically save under this spam load? Do you have funds in limbo because a bunch of degenerates decided to take a shit in the public park?
I expect this kind of bullshit on other shitcoins.
This spam bullshit has made running LN infra an absolute nightmare in 2023.
This isn’t adding anything but spam and noise, and these spamming morons are just sapping value from the system.
reply
307 sats \ 8 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 18 Apr
Runes ?
reply
62 sats \ 7 replies \ @nym 18 Apr
Looks like it.
reply
90 sats \ 6 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 18 Apr
100 percent Runes.
Bets on how high sats per v/byte will go?
reply
85 sats \ 5 replies \ @nym 18 Apr
90 sats v/byte for low priority
reply
11 sats \ 4 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr
Add a zero.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @nym 20 Apr
https://m.stacker.news/27370
Halfway to your prediction already!
reply
6 sats \ 1 reply \ @JakeBlockchain OP 23 Apr
The post-halving blocks were WILD as expected.
https://m.stacker.news/27849
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @nym 23 Apr
For sure! You called it!
reply on another page
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nym 19 Apr
https://m.stacker.news/27352
I'm sure you will be correct in the longer term.
reply
219 sats \ 2 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 18 Apr
Degens gonna degen.
reply
115 sats \ 1 reply \ @leaf 18 Apr
People just like to graffiti. Some if it is great. Most of it is shit.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr
Art be like that.
reply
140 sats \ 2 replies \ @BITC0IN 18 Apr
shitcoiners gonna shitcoin
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @JakeBlockchain OP 18 Apr
Bitcoiners gonna bitcoin
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 18 Apr
Spammers going to spam.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 19 Apr
Let the great rugging of 24/25 begin and eventually get relegated to the history books only to be rebranded in 29/30 for a next rugging of even bigger proportions.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @nichro 19 Apr
Question from someone who's only used LN casually and haven't dove into the full rabbit hole first, just knowledgeable of the concepts:
Is there a difference in how different LN wallets and services handle high fees?
Say custodial vs something like phoenix (splicing, single channel non-custodial) vs zeus (everything DIY) ?
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 18 Apr
Everyone knew it was possible 10 years ago, but they abandoned it because they are not brain dead. Stop spamming you barbarians.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @0245bdaef2 19 Apr
sees man pissing into his own butt
Man: “Pretty crazy to think about. No one thought it was possible a year ago.
Now here we are with absolute madness set to unleash tomorrow.”
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 23 Apr
A+ response sir lmao
https://m.stacker.news/27852
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 19 Apr
Timers, timechain,
That fusion on timechain is way ahead, tomorrow is just a world full of better ideas.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @rtr 18 Apr
So. What exactly is the point of runes and tokens? Is there anything for someone not interested in the whole NFT/DeFi crap to be excited about this?
Is this just redoing what's been done on Ethereum but on Bitcoin? What is it trying to achieve?
reply
63 sats \ 1 reply \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr
Too early to tell but probably not.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @rtr 19 Apr
That's a shame. I hope it doesn't bloat the txn fees too much for too long.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @notgeld 18 Apr
I respect runes for simplicity and merketint but "token economy" was always possible since 10 years ago.
Nowadays better to use Liquid. It has even a DeX for them.
reply
205 sats \ 0 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr
If tech mattered most, Liquid would be crushing it.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 19 Apr freebie
That's why we can't have nice things: there'll always develop a pocket of idiots who think they've solved something amazing, while all they managed to do was the very thing people begged them not to.
One of the reasons that I simply despise humans; we can't let things be what they're supposed to be, everyone has to put their little ignorant "mark" onto something, destroying it in the end.