pull down to refresh

4/5 still work, 2 others that I can't find.
Next should be setting up a multisig with these and moving funds over.
The only people who need hardware wallets are the influencers that get paid to shill them.
Literally cost less than $5/ea to manufacture. Very high Idiot Index.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @harrr 31 Mar
Literally cost less than $5/ea to manufacture
That's only relevant if you think your time is worthless.
reply
Your time is worth less... is equivalent to You have low time-preference
reply
Same question as for Darth:
What do you propose for people securing considerable sums of bitcoin? For instance, wealthy people wanting to put some of their money in bitcoin and take self custody of it without too much compromises in terms of security. Do you think self/collab custody with hw wallets makes sense for them?
reply
The amount of wealth is irrelevant. You do not need a fancy calculator to keep a secret, or create a digital signature.
Just because a wealthy person can afford to buy expensive e-waste, doesn't mean they need it.
reply
Phones are pretty secure these days. Apps are sandboxed. You can flash them with hardened firmware like GrapheneOS. You can use a dedicated phone as a wallet and never connect it to internet.
reply
A pixel also costs some money of course, but thanks for the feedback.
reply
wasting sats.... I use NONE. I do not need any of those.
reply
Need.. probably not. Since 2014ish, I've always signed txs from an air gapped device (outside of lightning's hot wallet).
reply
IMHO is too much paranoia with these HW. Use the 3 levels stash method and your hodl stash is absolutely secure. I had in the past some HW but I gave them away to noobs. Not useful for me at all.
Read more here:
But if you want to use those HW, go ahead... more sats for me.
No Seedsigner? Seedsigner is where its at.
reply
Where is bitbox?
reply
next is to learn how to make yours.