pull down to refresh
47 sats \ 0 replies \ @byzantine 13 Feb 2024
this book is terrible. hands down not worth anyone's time. i had to stop halfway through.
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @arrivederci 13 Feb 2024
Is Molly a no-coiner ? I get that impression but not super familiar with her.
Anyway, if she is, she's providing an example here of how no-coiners can be useful. Bullshit busting of crypto-scamming frauds like Chris Dixon. Sadly, she's providing this service of identifying sharks while ignoring the life-boat that is Bitcoin.
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @brandonsbytes OP 14 Feb 2024
deleted by author
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @arrivederci 14 Feb 2024 freebie
Yeah, I've been reading through some of her other stuff in the past 20 minutes. She looks to be an intelligent, usefully critical, no-coiner. Haven't found an overt denunciation of Bitcoin but a few suggestions that she is anti or at least a 'non-believer'. (Her style is more documentary and she seems to indicate her own opinions through irony and sarcasm.)
I had some recollection of coming across her before and when I checked her profile on twitter, found that I was already following her and had previously added her to my private lists of 'AI Scepticism' and 'Good BTC sceptics' (1 of only 3 on that list; informed & intelligent BTC sceptics are hard to find).
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Kathleen_Croteau 14 Feb 2024
She's a pretty good analyst.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Malachi17 13 Feb 2024
So he wrote a book about being ignored?
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @brandonsbytes OP 13 Feb 2024
deleted by author
reply
41 sats \ 0 replies \ @chairman_pretense 13 Feb 2024
It's "dead" to tech VCs who don't see any way to make money from it. You can basically understand all VC analysis through this lens. If it can make them rich, it's innovative and good. If not, it's dead.
(Which is also why they consider bitcoin dead, they would rather premine "web3" shitcoins to dump on retail.)
reply