765 sats \ 1 reply \ @luffy OP 9 Jan
Careful what you read on the internet. The best source of information about the SEC is the SEC.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @badabing 10 Jan
Priceless.
reply
626 sats \ 2 replies \ @jgbtc 9 Jan
How do we know those are actually Gary's words and not the hackers?
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 10 Jan
Nice, someone who thinks like me
I think the answer is we don't
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 10 Jan
How do we know anything on X is genuine and authentic? Was it signed?
reply
332 sats \ 3 replies \ @luffy OP 9 Jan
This shit feels so rigged.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @justanumber 9 Jan freebie
I agree
44 sats \ 1 reply \ @Eobard 9 Jan
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 10 Jan
Seems legit to me /s
reply
33 sats \ 5 replies \ @siggy47 9 Jan
This is great if it's true!
reply
283 sats \ 4 replies \ @carlosfandango 9 Jan
Those hackers do have a sense of humour after all, or did they bet on a price spike…
reply
851 sats \ 3 replies \ @orthwyrm 9 Jan
Someone should sue the SEC for market manipulation.
reply
50 sats \ 2 replies \ @quark 9 Jan
it seems we need a SEC2 to regulate the SEC. LOL
what if it was really a manipulation? I can't believe it was some hacker having some fun.
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @orthwyrm 9 Jan freebie
They got back control of the account awfully quickly if it were indeed hacked.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @KesterBils 9 Jan
It's definitely a manipulation.
reply
161 sats \ 0 replies \ @orthwyrm 9 Jan
https://m.stacker.news/11500
reply
45 sats \ 1 reply \ @zapomatic 9 Jan
just Gary testing the market reaction.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SpaceHodler 10 Jan
He just did a little extra trade on insider news to earn more sats.
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @IgnaciobTato 10 Jan
Something really odd happened. The price of bitcoin fall before Gary Gensler post about the hack.
In fact the price recovered after his post tille there is a second regain and post about the hack.
Seems to be that there was inside information but not well coordinated to wait to some posts.
I guess that this must be investigated. Who won?
- The guy that bought and sold on top.
- The SEC because now they will wait for Q2 for the approval.
Who lost?
The people.
https://m.stacker.news/11518
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 10 Jan
Can't lose if you don't play
reply
3 sats \ 0 replies \ @tomlaies 10 Jan
This isn't odd. It makes 100% sense.
The hacker knew what he was doing and traded btc, probably with leverage. Large trades move exchange rates.
reply
28 sats \ 1 reply \ @Atreus 10 Jan
I liked it better when we were at 16K
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bitcoinisawesome 10 Jan
Cheap sats, 1svb, no etf. <3
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @TwoLargePizzas 10 Jan
They got hacked is almost certainly a lie. So what really happened?
Intentional market manipulation? Maybe, but that might be a little too obvious.
My speculation so far...
- Someone did approve the ETF and the tweet went out.
- Then someone else with higher authority reneged on the approval.
- Caught with their pants down they lied about the hack.
Still, any explanation is pretty wild to think about. None of these things look good for the SEC and it certainly reinforces clown world 🤡
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @KesterBils 9 Jan
I don't think this is a hack, I believe it's manipulation at its highest order and we should expect more of that once an ETF is approved.
Hodling and DCA is bae.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 9 Jan
Twitter2Nitter
Clearnet: nitter.net | nitter.it | nitter.cz | nitter.at | nitter.unixfox.eu | nitter.poast.org | nitter.privacydev.net | nitter.d420.de | nitter.sethforprivacy.com | nitter.nicfab.eu | bird.habedieeh.re | nitter.salastil.com | nt.ggtyler.dev
Tor: nitter7bryz3..q553qd.onion | 26oq3gioiwcm..b4wwid.onion | vfaomgh4jxph..dauqad.onion | nitraeju2mip..evvuqd.onion | codeine3hsqn..brdqqd.onion
I2P: axd6uavsstsr..zf4q.b32.i2p | u6ikd6zndl3c..n2qa.b32.i2p | gseczlzmiv23..aoua.b32.i2p | tm4rwkeysv3z..4weq.b32.i2p | vernzdedoxuf..agva.b32.i2p
Lokinet: nitter.priv.loki/
Nitter is a free and open source alternative Twitter front-end focused on privacy and performance. Click here for more information.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @bitcoin_rationalist 10 Jan
https://m.stacker.news/11515
reply
2 sats \ 3 replies \ @quark 9 Jan
hacked? this feels so strange. They may have to prove it was hacked. it smells very suspicious.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 9 Jan
most large firms use various social media services to schedule and post messages....perhaps someone set the schedule wrong? Tues at 4pm instead of Weds at 4pm....?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @edulopesf 10 Jan
Exactly
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @KesterBils 9 Jan
It smells suspicious because it is.
This is manipulation at its peak
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Ge 10 Jan
What do we really think will happen I think it won't get approved anytime soon just too much work for them to do... eventually will it yes in an attempt to regulate it and also price manipulation as it did with gold and silver... end of the day etfs are for lazy people who don't dyor why would a person by paper gold, silver,s&p 500, bitcoin over the real thing..
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @dave9000 10 Jan
Does anyone actually believe that it was hacked? Come on...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @piecover 10 Jan
I hope so
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 10 Jan
Lol bears and bulls got rekt on an SEC tweet and a 10 minute candle, you just gotta love it
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Entrep 10 Jan
This is madness and SEC should be held responsible
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 10 Jan
This spectacle almost makes the ETF hype worth it. Imagine being someone that takes these clowns serious.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @geeknik 10 Jan
The 33rd chair of the SEC sez...
https://m.stacker.news/11519
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 9 Jan
Nice fake out!
Was that a "sell the news" dump?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OneOneSeven 9 Jan
Yes, keep the dip going!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @hasherstacker 10 Jan freebie
Financial Services Committee be like ⬇️
https://fxtwitter.com/MichaelRoerade/status/1744885976030122285
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @03bebce944 10 Jan
deleted by author
reply