pull down to refresh
4 sats \ 3 replies \ @BTCMiner 26 May 2022
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @davidc 26 May 2022
This doesn’t make sense. $40mm / 30 PH is $1,333 per TH. At most the machines cost $100 per TH, likely closer to $80 per TH. So if the energy infrastructure cost $1,250 per TH then at current machine efficiency it takes about 78 years of free operations to get to $0.06/kWh.
I think the $40mm refers to all of what Blockstream has raised using BMN. I don’t think all of it has been invested into this project.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @faithandcredit 26 May 2022
Is the only purpose to mine Bitcoin? Or will the solar farm also be able to sell power to the grid?
reply
6 sats \ 0 replies \ @BTCMiner 26 May 2022
Your rigs are profitable up to $0.15 per kWh, and the grid is willing to pay $0.25 per kWh.
Would it be a rational economic decision to turn off the rigs and redirect that power to supply the grid?
Yes, yes it would!!
However, this installation is a "pilot" and is also "off-grid", so there's no ability to supply the grid, as far as I could tell. But if this proves that bitcoin mining using solar + battery works well enough to be viable, future expansion could be built where supplying the grid when it is profitable becomes a capability as well.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @faithandcredit 26 May 2022
We live in the most interesting of times.
reply