pull down to refresh

deleted by author
In the UK, we have this thing called a TV license. It's as ridiculous as it sounds. People who watch state TV (BBC) must by law pay £159 / year.
As you can imagine, not many people cough up the money. The BBC is shit and the law is next to impossible to enforce. So if you're not on the TV license register, the government instead harasses you with angry little letters to try and scare you into paying. I hate these things so much that I ritualistically set fire to them whenever they land in my letter box, which is about every other month.
The longer you ignore the letters, the angrier they get. The first letter is just kind of stern. By the third letter they're screaming at you in big red capital letters about how you're under surveillance and breaking the law. By the fifth letter they threaten to send a "television inspector" to your address if you still haven't gotten back to them.
The inspector almost never comes. It's all hot air. But the fact that there is such a thing as a TV inspector in the first place blows my fuckin' mind. This is surely peak BS, right up there with the poor bastards who print the stupid letters out in the first place.
reply
"You will pay us to feed you propaganda and you will be happy" I'm sure even the queen had enough of it
reply
Sounds similar to what we have with the "Rundfunkbeitrag" in Germany.
It's like a tax disguised as not a tax because our public media should be independent but the state gives them the right to send every household a bill as long as they have any device which might receive the signals they broadcast.
So if you have a TV, Radio or just internet access, you need to pay.
reply
deleted by author
reply
I never had to pay
reply
It could be worse. Italy is dealing with the same shit, but instead of sending you letters they literally force everyone to pay this nonsense tax, by coupling the amount to electricity bills. Yes, you heard that right, the government is colluding with private utility companies to enforce something that would be otherwise complete bullshit.
reply
That's bonkers.
reply
People who watch state TV (BBC) must by law pay £159 / year.
If I'm understanding this right they're expecting people to pay for something that is broadcast to them regardless of if they want it or not.
Or do they actually know that you're watching somehow? If you just tell them you don't watch the BBC are you still supposed to pay?
reply
They have to know you are watching.
Inspectors have no right to enter your property without permission. So on the extremely rare occassion one does show up, you can say just say no.
It's next to unenforcable. The only people who pay are the elderly who don't know any better (and BBC enthusiasts I guess?)
Maybe a few decades ago where TVs were less common the law could actually be applied effectively. To give you a sense of how archiac this system is, the government generously lowers the fee to ~£60 / year if you only have a black and white TV.
reply
reply
Almost as stupid as the Stamp Act.
reply
I could never imagine that level of absurdity. But coming from the state, everything is possible.
reply
deleted by author
reply
I'd love to be the TV Inspector. Bet it would impress everyone
reply
I worked in a medical lab for a long time. I often thought 85% of the tests were unwarranted and the results usually meaningless. It’s a big racket.
reply
I think notary is in my top5 bsJobs, in my country they could be easily swapped with an datacenter with database. Full stop. Average gross salary 200k euro.
reply
You just won a zap.
In my country it's a clear racket, the notaries themselves know it and it creates this pride of "being in" and not having to work but just collect from you.
reply
I can feel you man! The nice things could be that we are not from the same country so this feeling is not just related to a specific place in the world.
reply
US Senator
reply
Politicians. Yep
reply
Pet Psychics :)
reply
Everything done by bank employees. It's been fully automated long ago and Satoshi put the nail in the coffin on that trade by making it trustless.
Going to a bank is so depressing, I keep saying all the time "this doesn't make any sense, why are these poor people doing that job instead of being home with their wives/husbands and kids?"
reply
Personally I think that statement is oxymoronic.
Jobs exist for a reason. A bullshit job as you call it isn’t something that anyone can do. The way business works - as we are seeing with the constant layoffs is that the moment it’s not relevant it’s cancelled.
People may disagree with highly paid people for jobs they think are BS but that’s their opinion.
I could also be wrong tbf. Provide examples and I’ll provide a response
reply
This sounds oxymoronic until you realize that the government adds all kinds of modifications to business and free markets that require so much bs. Now, an argument can be made that these jobs aren't bs because they solve a problem. It is a problem that shouldn't exist but still.
In my experience the larger the institution the more likely there will be bs jobs and people milking money out of the beast. We often only focus on government agencies as being wasteful but there is plenty of waste in the business world. People have mentioned middle managers but there are more. The larger the company the easier it is to disappear.
I bet there are devs here including me that have spent months building applications for those apps to just be thrown away because of the whim of someone. Most people that work in large companies don't produce anything tangible and this can lead to people feeling like their job is totally bs.
reply
I heard a story the other day from one of the game developers that got laid off recently.
It wasn't that they'd lost their job that upset them the most. It was the fact that the project they'd spent years working on got cancelled and it felt like all those nights and weekends working overtime, missing out on time with their family had gone to waste.
On the other hand, these layoffs are most likely because the company took out a lot of debt and now they can't afford it at the higher interest rates. So when you think about it, it's not so much at the whim of someone else, but simply people acting rationally in their own self interest. Trace it back far enough and it's remarkable how many times it comes back to centrally planned government decisions.
reply
Sounds like you are new to fiat money. Jobs exist for a reason under free markets, pull your head out of your ass and realize those don't exist under fiat. Yes, you are wrong, very deeply wrong, likely incurably.
reply
Middle management would often fit this description
reply
Jobs funded by fiat subsidies that lose money -- oh, you think it's a real job because you are an engineer designing in aircraft that actually is flying? -- run the numbers and think again. There is more BS than you realize under fiat.
reply
Being good at something that doesn't need to be done doesn't mean that job should be done.
reply
TransparentCalifornia.com is eye-opening. Type in nurse, police, firefighter etc. These are not bullshit jobs but government paying 2-3x market rate because it's California and no one here has ever cared about fiscal responsibility. It's mind-blowing.
reply
At this point, the only jobs should be coding and sales. If you're not coding, you can use code to automate it, the only thing you can't automate is human relationships, so you need people for that.
reply
lol. Call me when your plumbing stops working, or when you need a new home. I know some guys. I hope that was in jest.
reply
deleted by author
reply
deleted by author
reply