Disclaimer: Before we dive into this rant, let me make one thing crystal clear. I'm not here to bash the folks who playfully embrace the cult-like jokes and ironic vibes in the Bitcoin community. You know, those lighthearted trolls who find it amusing to mess with people's heads. This is directed at the real idiots, the ones who genuinely take things to a whole new level of crazy. So if you're feeling offended by any of this, maybe it's time for a rationality check. Also, I'm not here to attack anyone personally for their beliefs, I love steak as much as the next guy and I support you in your fight for your right to not being vaccinated against your will, but I'm NOT OK with any kind of extremism.
Introduction: I'm not the first person, nor the last one, who felt something close to "finding the light" when I started studying Bitcoin and the history of money. It showed me an ugly side of the world that I can not unsee anymore, while at the same time, it gave me something that aligns with my way of seeing the world despite its ugliness. And let's face it, many of us share this sentiment. However, this has also attracted a bunch of fanatics who take things to a whole new level of crazy. I think they need to be called out, just like we've called out the cryptobros, and make it clear that we don't want to be mixed up as part of their antics. Let's dive into this mess and bring some rationality back into the Bitcoin scene.
The Lunatic Fringe: Seriously, have you seen these people? They've not only made Bitcoin their entire personality but they've gone off the deep end, spouting off conspiracies and embracing the weirdest ideologies you can imagine. This includes, but is not limited to: carnivorous diet freaks, climate change deniers, extreme Christians, anti-vaxxers, doomers, alt-right supporters, and my favorite ones, those who dismiss psychiatry and psychology as "FIAT sciences." It's like either they've been expecting the world to end for a long time and found in Bitcoin a new kind of monetary salvation, or they were a bunch of virtue signallers who found in Bitcoin a new virtue to signal on because, of course, they are geniuses for finding Bitcoin before the rest of the world. Newsflash: Bitcoin is awesome, but it doesn't make you a genius or the only enlightened soul on this planet. If the world ends tomorrow, you won't be saved because you have Bitcoin, Christ, grass-fed steaks, you're unvaccinated, and you own a bunch of guns. Nobody will come begging on their knees for your Bitcoin or for you to teach them "the right way of living". We all know the government is a cartel and should not be blindly trusted, but guess what? Everyone knows that, not just us. Following stupid ideas just to be anti-establishment is as idiotic as following them because it's what the establishment says and "they are the people who know". To me it looks as if people take "Don't trust verify" to a whole new level where they take as verification anything that assures them that what they've been taught is a lie, no matter how ridiculous.
Tainted Perception: The extremist faction within the Bitcoin community has had a detrimental impact on how the wider public perceives us. Their loud voices and outrageous beliefs have led outsiders to label us all as a bunch of nutjobs. It's incredibly frustrating. We need to make it clear that we're not all conspiracy theorists. We're just regular people who see the potential of Bitcoin for various reasons. Some of us view it as a financial revolution, while others consider it the best asset available or are fascinated by its resilience despite its flaws. However, these extremists have caused skeptics to believe that we're all drinking the same Kool-Aid. Let's face it, explaining Bitcoin is no easy task, and we often come across as maniacs when we try to convey its intricacies to others. Additionally, we may engage in mocking the cryptobros, which can inadvertently make us appear elitist. But the truth is, most of us have simply arrived at the conclusion that Bitcoin is the best choice based on our own considerations. However, it's important to recognize that this doesn't make it a universal solution or elevate anyone to the status of genius. What's even more amusing is that we all know it. We're well aware that these extreme views held by some individuals within the community are utterly ridiculous. We all laugh at it, we make fun of them, and when people call us any of those things, we usually try to own it and use it as a flag to ridicule them. But there's a big difference between that and really believing any of it.
Rejecting the Lunacy: Personally, I don't want to be associated with those people. Sure, I can appreciate the humor and proudly display my laser eyes and "Delinquent Bitcoiner" tag on my Twitter profile, and all the Bitcoin merch I've bought or have been given by others because I love Bitcoin, but I do so despite them, not because of them. Bitcoin is a neutral form of money, and it's no surprise that the tinfoil hat-wearing lunatics are drawn to it. However, we should not allow them to define the image of the Bitcoin community. The majority of us value common sense and critical thinking, not fanaticism, virtue signalling, and apocalyptic prophecies. It's true that extremism often emerges alongside notions of freedom and independence, which is why some individuals are attracted to Bitcoin like moths to a flame. But that doesn't mean we should tolerate or embrace their idiocy.
Conclusion: Bitcoin deserves better than the extremist circus that has taken over the community. It's time we distance ourselves from those who propagate irrationality and conspiracy theories. Bitcoin is simply a tool for trade, but one with immense potential. The Bitcoin community shouldn't be defined by the fringe, but by individuals who value rationality, common sense, and open dialogue. While some may find humor in the exaggerated antics and ironic behaviour, it's important to differentiate between those engaging in playful banter and the genuine extremists who believe in their absurd ideologies. We understand that not everyone is on board with Bitcoin, and that's perfectly fine. People have the right to be skeptical and critical. We shouldn't dismiss their concerns but instead engage in respectful discussions and provide well-reasoned arguments. So let's make it clear: we don't endorse the extremists. We don't align ourselves with their outlandish beliefs. We laugh at them, mock them, and separate ourselves from their misguided notions. We are a diverse community with a range of perspectives, motivations, and reasons for being involved in Bitcoin. Bitcoin may have exposed the flaws of the current financial system, but we're not the only ones who see it. Let's encourage rationality, critical thinking, and open dialogue not just within our community, but also with those who hold different viewpoints.
This has also been publish on my personal substack
I have some questions:
  1. You used the word extremism in various forms in your title and many, many times in your post. Can you tell me what you mean by extremism?
  2. What is an extreme Christian?
  3. What is your definition of alt right?
reply
He's trying to change reality itself, so why even bother ;-)
reply
How am I trying to change reality?
reply
Extremism: Radicalization of ideas
Extreme Christians: I it's self explanatory, but lets be clear, the Level 5 vegans of Christianism.
Alt-Right: Racists and/or homophobes who try to desguise themselves as anti-wokes and conservatives.
Both of these groups are the kind of people who "know the way" and tell others how they should live their lives.
reply
The reason I ask is because you raise a lot of important issues and I want to try to express my feelings accurately. I come to bitcoin as a libertarian. That's how I originally discovered bitcoin. That does not mean that I want to force everyone who has embraced bitcoin to agree with me. I support Peter McCormack 's efforts to attract more left leaning influencers to bitcoin. Like any human, I have a variety of views, but I don't seek to force those beliefs on others. I don't eat red meat for health reasons. I am not a homophobe. I did not accept the covid vaccine. When you repeatedly use terms like "extreme", alt-right, etc I think you are playing into the same us versus them mentality you complain about in other bitcoiners. Your buzzwords just scream MSNBC and CNN to me, and you seem as extreme as the guy slaughtering his own beef, or more so. Maybe my impression is wrong. If so, I apologize. In any event, thanks for posting. It is important to talk about.
reply
I think you got me wrong.
It's really hard to talk about this topic without falling into the "us vs them" mentality, I'm not trying to do so, but it's true that it could look like so. I don't want to shield myself, but English is not my first language, so maybe sometimes I what I want to express comes out different to what I thought initially, but this also happens to me in Spanish, so no biggy I guess. I might have a misinformed definition of some of the words I used, and for that I'm sorry, it muds the waters of what I want to convey, but the main idea is the same.
To clarify, I don't like politics, I escaped a communist dictatorship and that makes me hate the left, but I also despise the right.
reply
I understand. I have trouble expressing myself too, and I am a native english speaker! Your English is very good and you raise important issues.
reply
tldr; This is an extreme fringe movement and it's going to be full of extreme fringe weirdos.
I appreciate you labelling this as a rant: that's solid introspection and it changes the nature of my reply. My counter is that the very last group who will get into Bitcoin will be those who buy into all the establishment approved opinions and fear of "extremism".
Early adopters are almost by definition going to be those most dissatisfied with the status quo, whether their reasons are correct or not.
Separation of money and state is an extreme idea and many people would think of you as the kind of "extremist" they need to distance from, just for holding it. I think we'll do better by engaging with people's ideas and amplifying those voices who will have a civilized honest conversation, regardless of what particular views they hold.
reply
I'm not completely in favor of what you say, but I really do appreciate your comment. It's true that separating money and state would look as a extreme idea to some but one thing is doing it by "insert sly roundabout way quote here" and people realizing the alternative is better, and the is trying to overthrow the state and all the power estructures. I hope I explained myself.
reply
Don't get me wrong, there are many people in the Bitcoin community who I find completely obnoxious (and for some of the same reasons you listed), but it's very common for movements to fall into this kind of infighting and gatekeeping. I think we should steer clear of it and maintain the position that Bitcoin is for everyone. If Bitcoin is the extent of our area of agreement, fine. If we have more in common, fantastic. If we have things to learn from each other, even better.
Another error movements make is pandering for mainstream acceptance. Bitcoin threatens the system. There's no amount of respectable behavior that will prevent the system from smearing all of us with whatever pejoratives they come up.
All that said, I'm glad you're in here and that there is one more less intense voice than there otherwise would be.
reply
Oh yeah, I know. It reminds me a lot of the Stallman fans when I was a kid who enjoyed FOSS, most of us simply liked FOSS because it was, obviously free, but also because the sense of comradery there was, how ethical it all was, but there were also the idiots who would like to call anyone who didn't make their own computer fron scratch with Open Source hardware and didn't use Trisquel or GNU Herd "Not s true believer".
I know the wave lf idiota won't disappear, and they will be displaced by a different wave of idiots that might be even mlre idiotic, more extreme and possibly sharing a totally different political view, but I would never stop calling out idiocy, nobody holds the ultimate truth.
reply
I support you in your fight for your right to not being vaccinated against your will, but I'm NOT OK with any kind of extremism.
The problem is that some people would consider it extreme to not get vaxxed.
Personally, I think it is extreme to force people to get vaxxed against their will, especially when the vax is less than a year old, only approved under emergency order, and doesn't have good data to back up its efficacy.
My point is that extremism is in the eye of the beholder. Many people will think you are extreme just for supporting Bitcoin (destroying the environment, right-winger, yada yada yada).
But I do understand what you're saying... there is a lot of cultish behavior, virtue-signaling, and shibboleths going on in certain segments of the Bitcoin community... I don't support that but people are free to interact how they choose. Bitcoin doesn't care
reply
Individualists don't use the word "we" to describe their own personal opinion.
I suffer from food allergies and quite literally the paleo/carnivore diet is the only way for me to be healthy and able to exercise and - actually it shut me out of society because of the way it made me feel so nervous and that plus all the life experience.
I am of the opinion that you want us to not talk about what our experiences or just opinions might be about things.
I don't care. If you really understood the bird's eye view of the depth of the poisoning of our society when it is governed by cantillionaires and their banker cartel buddies it's everywhere. It's in the food. It's in the medicine.
We don't have things like DDT and Thalidomide today but we have a whole range of other things. Microplastics. nanoparticles. RNA messenger code inside, the dirty thing they dare not name, a VIRUS that is how that RNA is pushed into our cells. Oh, nothing to be alarmed about there, it can't possibly get into your stem cells right?
If you know the history of even one fiat approved, and by fiat, every friggin law of the government that exists, almost without exception, favor some group over some other group. Established large companies versus their competitors, for example. And they also then pick this sledgehammer tool, the lobby power, to even try to make it law to buy their products.
Oh, but that's a conspiracy theory.
If you think there isn't time in life to ponder the things that make you go HMMM and want to talk about it with people...
Just don't do it in front of this guy or he will make a wall of text. Gasp. Sigh.
reply
Nosism: from Latin nos 'we', is the practice of using the pronoun we to refer to oneself when expressing a personal opinion.
You got me wrong, I'm not against people expressing their opinions, I myself wrote this to to express an opinion, I'm against idiocy. I'm not here to discuss ideologies or the sincerity of the government.
reply
Well, you get what you want. Some people think it's really clever to say things that the majority of their audience is going to disagree with on some really fundamental sticking points like honesty and the fact that the point is deceptively crafted way of browbeating people into submission.
Some people call that trolling.
reply
Then kill yourself, worthless scum, because you're a fucking idiot!
reply
I think i found one of those extremist you were talking about.
reply
The irony is that this leftist cuck's post is the real extremism. Like they say, the commies are awful people pretending to be nice, and the toxic people are nice people pretending to be awful.
reply
I love being called leftist by people who don't know me, moreso when I scaped a communist dictatorahip and now spend a great deal pf time explaining why voting the left is the worst idea possible.
Thanks for the input again my man! You seem chill and really nice.
reply
It's funny how you pretend to be some "chill dude" when you have already established you are an arrogant, low IQ piece of shit.
reply
And a troll.
I wouldn't refer to him as "left" but "authoritarian". Liking to use the plural personal pronoun, talking about people shutting up. That's not left or right that's totalitarianism.
There is definitely a lot of noise within bitcoin communities as well.
One thing I learned while studying Bitcoin was how to develop a better filter.
There is a lot of valuable information shared from bitcoiners imo, stuff that won't be talked about on MSM, but it also comes with a lot of bs. Gotta be able to filter well.
reply
Pathetic bottom take. You are blaming victims.
Overweight people have been sold β€œlow-fat potato chips” and told exactly the wrong advice on losing weight. That is psychological abuse.
We have been forced to work for money that others print for free. That is attempted enslavement.
We have been coerced into taking experimental drugs and encouraged to consume experimental food products, forced to participate in senseless wars, that is genocide.
The real extremists are the bankers and politicians actually attempting to kill us all with ww3 or bio weapon releases.
What kind of response is rational? Or is it too extreme to take drastic measures in response to actual genocide???
Grow a pair pussy.
I think for many people when they come to understanding bitcoin at a deeper level it breaks the illusion that mainstream institutions are benevolent.
Reconstructing your perception of "what is money" and learning about the decoupling from the Gold Standard, seignorage, and Cantillon effect reshape a worldview of the current problems we see today in society. As technology improves one would think that the standard of living should as well however these economic gains are antithetical to an inflationary monetary system and are consolidated to the 1% of the 1% via printing to offset the deflationary impact of technology.
While I agree its dumb to automatically take the opposite side of any MSM position on a case by case basis there is substance to other criticisms of institutions and much of it is incentive driven that eventually can be traced to who controls the money.
Big Pharmacy - lobby governments, bribe officials, capture regulators. Its somewhat intuitive to question the efficacy and tradeoffs of certain medications or vaccines when there is so much profit incentive to maximize shareholder value for Pfizer, Moderna, etc. Likewise there is real benefits to certain biotechnologies and medicines overtime so again I think critiques here can be done on a case by case position but medicine does have side effects and in many cases a person can avoid relying on it with a combo of exercise, diet and having mindful habits.
Climate change politics - again nuance is required here. Many climate change policies are inherently anti-human and seek to control and penalize people for just existing. The climate changes over time regardless of human impact. Pretending that a carbon tax is going to stop bad weather is aikin to the Aztecs and ancient civilizations doing a human sacrifice to get a good harvest. Imo the best way of "combatting" any of the extreme weather events comes down to humans being able to harness more energy. I agree that we probably don't want to be doubling down on coal or anything but its impossible to make a intellectually honest argument that we don't need fossil fuels for the foreseeable future. Increase the diversity of energy systems, desalination, carbon capture and other technologies will combat the underlying impact that "The Universe is hostile to human existence" and more entropy over time is literally a law of physics. The purpose of human existence is to fight back against this entropy via harnessing energy. Also there are many moral and ethical considerations to make as the developing world begins to use fossil fuels to improve their lives. Accounting for carbon and thinking that will solve everything is the most fiat diseased argument that sets up to be married perfectly to a CBDC. (I also think that micro plastics posie a larger environmental issue that carbon but its way easier to simplify and account for emissions than to calculate the impact of fiat based consumer economics degraging into the food supply)
In short as a TLDR: I agree that blindlessly agreeing with all conspiracy theories is dumb. However when I hear MSM take a position on a topic I am automatically inclined to believe the opposite because of the poor track record and reliance on monetary bribery they have. "Do your own research" and critical thinking are important skills to have. Also "where there is smoke, there's probably fire" - epstein and so many other conspiracies have ended up being correct its hard to have confidence in institutions until society is able to return to Scientific debate without fiat tainting the incentives of science and the press.
reply
not sure who 'we' is meant to describe - not me, for one.
'carnivorous diet freaks, climate change deniers, extreme Christians, anti-vaxxers, doomers, alt-right supporters' - these depictions are more revealing of your positions than anything else.
you're free to take any position you want on anything, as are they - if u want to present yourself as separate from those you revile, just do it - if your ideas are more robust they will be recognised as such - whining about theirs isn't valid.
as for Bitcoin being negatively affected by any of this - no.
reply
I never said you can't be any of those things or that they are bad per se. I'm talking about extremism when it comes to these kind of ideas, on the other extreme of the spectrum you have, respectively: raw vegans, antitheists, self medication freaks, bloomers and antifa-wokes. I don't want to speculate, but it looks like you thought I'd share any of those ideas, which I don't. And again, I'm not against ideas, I'm against extremism in ideas, extremism is always dangerous, it doesn't matter the side where it comes from, that's what I'm criticizing.
And no, it doesn't affect Bitcoin in the slightest, the network will keep producing 1 block every ten minutes regardless, but it taints the community as a whole, and when that happens, Nic "leave the cult" and starts scamming people, Taleb stars calling it a "test for idiots" and many more examples I don't remember right now, that perpetuates the idea that Bitcoin is either a scam or a cult, when it simply is a tool for trade.
reply
"we" is the #1 noob comment. People who are looking for a community
reply
Nosism: from Latin nos 'we', is the practice of using the pronoun we to refer to oneself when expressing a personal opinion.
That's a correct use of the word we for what I'm trying to convey, a personal opinion.
reply
Crazy ideas attract crazy people. I think it will mellow out as Bitcoin gains momentum.
Extremists find these sorts of things first because of how extreme their behavior is. They find themselves not accepted by most of the world. They find themselves banned on social media platforms. They find themselves in echo chambers looking for the next platform to migrate and ideas of being a victim to latch on to. In some ways they are victims, but they take it to extremes. As extremists do.
If you are that person, then Bitcoin is a siren calling you since it offers the most ultimate, uncensored respite for you to bathe your extremism in. When they own Bitcoin, no matter if they have more or less than a whole coin they already assume they have fuck you money.
They do not. And they will find no matter how much they accumulate, they cannot accumulate a stronger voice. Over time their noise will be drowned. Good entertainment for the ride.
reply
Interesting take, I think you're right, thanks for your input!
reply
Be aware of the bias towards the loud minority.
There's an overwhelming majority of "bitcoin normies" that have adopted bitcoin without ever feeling compelled to talk about it publicly or attend meetups.
The "crazies" are 100x more likely to start a podcast and devote their lives to spreading some message they feel compelled to get out.
The "fanatics" are 10x more likely to attend a meetup and surround themselves with other fanatics.
Also be aware of the cultural bias.
Bitcoin is global and as English speakers in the west, we don't get exposed to the Eastern/Mandarin bitcoiner culture. For starters, BIP 39 seed words aren't as popular in the East because of the English words used in the spec.
reply
Any idea of what they use instead of BIP 39 seed words?
reply
I read somewhere that they use numbers instead of the words. So something like this could be a seed phrase:
0001 0002 0003 0004 ... 2048
I also just posted this to try and solicit some china-btc cultural insight from the stackers: #210392
reply
Yeah, I was aware of localized word lists. Interesting about the raw numbers.
Thanks for posting the other thread! Checking out the podcast posted by @siggy47
reply
Yeah I'm all for making it clear that Bitcoin is not related to cast iron pans lol. I think we've seen a little bit of Bitcoin culture fragmentation. You got those Bitcoin twitter weirdos, you got the people on reddit just trying to figure out life, you got the nerds over here on SN. Hell I even know a group with a bunch of communists in it (something about keeping the state honest with the verifiable nature of Bitcoin helping communism work or something I don't know I won't pretend to understand their way of thinking).
Heck, I even have a post meming on the idea of Bitcoin being a religion, but I realized people take that more seriously than I thought and I've been clear to clarify what a social construct is instead.
reply
Yeah, a lot of people think that the way they view Bitcoin is "THE RIGHT ONE" and that couldn't be farther from the truth. For me Bitcoin is just: A social construct made a reality thanks to a technology that works because of human action. Bitcoin is whatever one wants it to define it to be, but it does not solve all the problems in the world and much less validates any of the ideas we have about the world or how it should be or work.
reply
BUT, "a lot of people think that the way they view Bitcoin is 'THE RIGHT ONE'" is exactly how social constructs tend to go don't you think?
reply
Yeah, defining what a social construct really is, is not easy, it sometimes comes as paradoxical, it becomes a constant reintroduction of the "No true Scotsman" fallacy. All you need is too people to interpret something as something else and there you have it, a social construct.
reply
If you believe that everyone should have a place in Bitcoin, those you call extremists also have the right to express their ideas. Let's not forget that extremism is a subjective concept, what you may see as extreme could be completely normal to me. It's just my humble point of view.
reply
I agree with your PoV on this, it's important to understand that Bitcoin is neutral and there's a place flr everyone, it's paradoxical that, I, as a libertarian (South American definition or libertarian) am against how some people express their ideas, but it's within my liberties to call them out if they are being irrational, wouldn't you say that's right as well?
reply
IMHO, it would be like if I proclaim the same thing about vegan bitcoiners. If it's for everyone, everyone should have a voice, and that voice should be respected unless it advocates for the violation of natural rights, such as the right to life or the right to private property.
reply
Oh no no, I didn't mean to say that people can't chose a way of living, I'm trying to say that there's no right way of living, and that people shouldn't be telling everyone else how they should live their life.
Vegans suffer from the same (and even more famously so) virtue signaling problem as carnivorous do, I used thise examples because they are the ones we are all seeing in Twitter, Nostr and other social media, I wouldn't be surprised if we get a wave of vegan Bitcoiners who say that Bitcoin mining could help reforestation could stop the farming industry or something outlandish like that.
This same point could have been made about anyone.
reply
I don't understand why people mix things, for example, guns & bitcoin. that's a big question mark for me.
reply
Both concepts are closely tied to libertarianism. Which libertarian would not be in favor of self-defense? Which libertarian would not support the separation of money from the government?
reply
I'm libertarian, but I'm not in favour of guns, I think the division of labour solved that issue, and the state should provide security, we just need a more reliable way than what we already have, I don't really buy that American idiology of "we need guns to preserve our freedoms" and I think I will never get it.
reply
You are not a libertarian (though there seems to be a very high correlation between self-proclaimed libertarians and trash "humans"). You are a LARPer. You have probably been here 6 months, since 2021 at most, and will sell your bitcoin within a year or two.
reply
deleted by author
reply
The Idea of separate money and state is to pacifically block the state of arm themselves. Without debt there is no way that a state can save money to arm themselves to go to war. Bitcoin is the opposite of an armed society. Without the state, all the weapons corporations will just diminish and perish.
reply
Weapons are being financed by governments. the "right" of having a gun, is exactly what the corporations that sustain your government wants. They are preparing the people for war, convincing then that learning how to kill in "self defence" is a good concept, but is all the opposite. Is not the first time this happens in human history. sorry but no, bitcoin has nothing to do with mass production of guns industry in the US.
reply
I don't want to contribute to the off-topic discussion, so I'll conclude this topic with a clarification. Just as I believe that money should be separate from the state, the monopoly of violence should also be abolished. If we leave the monopoly of violence in the hands of the state, we will not have moved towards a libertarian society; instead, it would be more like a minarchist society that would eventually grow back into a large state. If we believe that the state is illegitimate, we should not grant it any power, at least not voluntarily, and that includes the monopoly of violence (weapons).
Once again, this is just my perspective, and I may be mistaken.
reply
sounds like you spend too much time on twitter. if so I think that's your first mistake.
reply
5 minutes a day is enough to see this shit, it's unavoidable.
reply
I would like to request that you complete this test and share your results with all of us. It should take about 20 minutes but I think you will enjoy it.
reply
I present my test results: E: 31 C:-60 Libertarian capitalist: You support light restrictions on both economic and cultural freedom. You oppose increased economic regulations and the abolition of the state.
reply
Nice. That def puts you on the more extreme side of the current political spectrum though.
reply
I think you did not get the real meaning of my post. Extremism is independent from political currents and trends. Also, somebody's mentioned it before, extremism is in the eyes of the beholder, knowing this my test could be considered far left for an American while far right for a Latin American, anyways my main point was that trying to impose your beliefs on people and trying to use Bitcoin as a justifier for those beliefs is irrational.
reply
Bitcoin is for everyone
reply
I never said it wasn't
reply
reply
"carnivorous diet freaks, climate change deniers, extreme Christians, anti-vaxxers, doomers, alt-right supporters, and my favorite..."
YOU SMARMY ARROGANT FUCKWADS ARE THE EPITOME OF FIAT AND THE WORLD IS WORSE OFF FOR YOU GETTING A WIRE IN YOUR DEEP FIAT BRAIN CROSSED AND OWNING BITCOIN TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!!!
πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•
Eat a bag of dicks and sell all your Bitcoin you worthless piece of shit.
I hope you get wrench attacked and lose all your bitcoin, trolling stupid-ass motherfucker.
Worthless illiterates like you are what bitcoin fixes, you can suck my dick!
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you, you statist cuck. Keep sucking the state's dick and ingesting the 'current thing' instead of spewing this diarrhea onto StackerNews. You are dangerous trash, and arrogant people who think they know how others should live their lives is exactly what Bitcoin helps protect people from.
Thank you for reminding me what trash most people are and that I shouldn't be so soft and cuddly all the time. Too easy to be too nice and friendly.
reply
reply
I have been rock climbing in the mountains of Bow Valley and drinking spring water I collected myself. Given your screechy rant and deep concern with others while you cling to your leftism, it seems you are the one who could do with more time outside.
reply
deleted by author
reply
deleted by author
reply
You didn't get at all what I meant and on top of that found a way to both find this offensive and accuse me of a communist without even knowing me.
You're exactly the kind of people who I'm talking about, I don't consider you and idiot because you hold a belief system, I consider you an idiot because you jumped to conclusions, called me a whiner for, what i to sure you call "not doing something", I don't really know what's there to do other than call you on your bullshit and mock you, and because you made me your enemy out of nowhere.
You're the exact definition of what I'm trying to convey as extremism and idiocy, not because you believe in anything in particular, but becausebof your irrational behavior.
reply