What would you change?
pull down to refresh
0 new comment
1782 sats \ 9 replies \ @nerd2ninja 3 Mar 2023
I would (and might one day) create a script to install the full lightning stack to empower users currently stuck with whatever decisions Umbrel might make because they don't have to technical understanding required were Umbrel big blockers during a blocksize war.
reply
0 new comment
343 sats \ 4 replies \ @Eximpius 3 Mar 2023
Use mynodebtc. You get everything you need in a package, but way easier to customize then all the rest in my opinion. You have total control unlike umbrel.
reply
0 new comment
12 sats \ 2 replies \ @nerd2ninja 3 Mar 2023
Still wish it were built for an x86 processor lol.
reply
0 new comment
22 sats \ 0 replies \ @Eximpius 3 Mar 2023
It is.... I'm running it right now on x86_64. Just download the PC image and not the ARM image
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Eximpius 3 Mar 2023
deleted by author
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 3 Mar 2023
Worth looking into.
reply
0 new comment
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 3 Mar 2023
Sign me up. That's my big fear. I would have the tech know how to vote on an important issue
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @falsefaucet 3 Mar 2023
do it.
please.
reply
0 new comment
26 sats \ 1 reply \ @nerd2ninja 3 Mar 2023
lol in the meantime, you could follow minibolt's tutorial: https://minibolt.info/
I hear Darthcoin has some decent guides as well.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @falsefaucet 3 Mar 2023
darthcoin is a G.
love what that guy does.
invaluable resource.
reply
0 new comment
1526 sats \ 0 replies \ @super_testnet 3 Mar 2023
Offline receiving
reply
0 new comment
840 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 3 Mar 2023
If I don't have to know how or if it can be done: Predictable fees
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kr OP 3 Mar 2023
That would be nice
reply
0 new comment
759 sats \ 0 replies \ @benthecarman 4 Mar 2023
PTLCs
reply
0 new comment
656 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 4 Mar 2023
Payment channel closing fees should always be paid by the channel closer.
I think the game theory would play out much differently if you had to think long and hard before closing out a channel and paid the fee.
As it stands right now, I can open a channel with anyone and they can just close it and I have to pay the fee.
reply
0 new comment
656 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinErrorLog 4 Mar 2023
Never exposing IP addresses.
reply
0 new comment
296 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 3 Mar 2023
eltoo now
reply
0 new comment
599 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 4 Mar 2023
Make it possible to run a pruned node that lives on your phone and you could establish a channel all from one device
reply
0 new comment
18 sats \ 0 replies \ @FatBear 4 Mar 2023
A few sats from all transactions go into my wallet magically.
reply
0 new comment
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @somosmasxmenos 4 Mar 2023
Improvement, optimization and unification of all the protocols of all the existing wallets between Lightning, not all of them can send payments to each other, you have to work on that
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @022fbc9cef 4 Mar 2023
Not the most urgent thing, but since all of the other stuff was already mentioned:
It would be great if you could combine multiple channels into a single bigger payment. Right now the maximum amount one can send at once is the biggest channel's capacity.
reply
0 new comment