Of course. Bringing everything on chain always meant a chain they owned and controlled. That's why I laugh at all the eth people who think Wall st is going to tokenize on ethereum. Keep dreaming.
Wouldn't put it behind Ripple to aggressively pursue this though. According to #1447432 (and https://archive.ph/xZ0Iq) they're next in line for a Fed master account.
Let them do it though... I don't think it extremely likely that I will use such a solution - theirs or someone else's.
Of course. Bringing everything on chain always meant a chain they owned and controlled. That's why I laugh at all the eth people who think Wall st is going to tokenize on ethereum. Keep dreaming.
Exactly... or Ripple... or __.
Wouldn't put it behind Ripple to aggressively pursue this though. According to #1447432 (and https://archive.ph/xZ0Iq) they're next in line for a Fed master account.
Let them do it though... I don't think it extremely likely that I will use such a solution - theirs or someone else's.
And the list goes on.
Someone tell me why the f you even need "blockchain" if it's centralized.
Marketing. None of these people know how a blockchain works, what problem it solves, and most of all... why proof of work is the key to bitcoin.
So you can call it "innovation" and enough of the right people know little enough to believe that.
Because it's got electrolytes.
https://twiiit.com/TheSurvivalPodc/status/2028521219075477605