pull down to refresh

348 sats \ 9 replies \ @optimism 24 Feb \ on: Basel's 1250% Mistake | Bitcoin Policy Institute bitcoin Politics_And_Law

I interpret this as: Bitcoin banking MUST be full reserve? I think that that makes sense? Any lower value would allow for paper Bitcoin, and any higher value would require banks to hoard Bitcoin.

Meet the team of parasites behind this push for fractional reserves that affinity scams their fiat maxi mindset with Bitcoin

write
preview
159 sats \ 8 replies \ @DarthCoin 24 Feb

This BPI should not even exist !

reply
225 sats \ 4 replies \ @siggy47 24 Feb

Agree. Remember why bitcoin was created. I'm rethinking that visit I planned to DC PubKey

reply
38 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 24 Feb
I'm rethinking that visit I planned to DC PubKey

Why?

reply
102 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 24 Feb

I'm kind of joking. The events seem slanted towards policy stuff.

reply
38 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 24 Feb

Ignoring it is possible if you aren't governed by it (or have another way to resist it.)

reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 24 Feb

Yes. That's why I'm still going

reply
2 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 24 Feb

I wonder how Jack feels about being the top zap on an org that advocates for paper Bitcoin 😂

reply
102 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 24 Feb

With so many nostr bots, all those zaps could even be from same individual, using multiple accounts and create a bandwagon of zaps and make others to zap too.

It's easy to manipulate people on nostr.

reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 24 Feb

It's easy to manipulate people because they don't follow that with great power (client-side filtering) comes great responsibility (actually configuring and maintaining your client-side filters.)

reply