https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/11/us/politics/trump-interview-white-people-discrimination.html
Trump said it clean: civil-rights-era protections “very badly treated” white people, “reverse discrimination.” In other words: he’s recasting the Second Reconstruction as the mistake.
That phrase matters because it’s not an argument about a specific edge-case policy. It’s a moral inversion: civil-rights enforcement becomes the injury, and whiteness becomes the protected class. Once you buy that, the “fix” is never “tighten standards.” The fix is to re-aim the institutions that were built to enforce the Second Reconstruction (the mid-century push to dismantle Jim Crow and expand equal citizenship)#1288677, and call it “merit.”
You can see the pivot in motion:
• EEOC as megaphone: the EEOC chair put out a targeted call asking white men to come forward with DEI-related discrimination complaints.
• DOJ as backstop (or not): in a Dec. 9, 2025 sign-on letter, former DOJ Civil Rights Division staff say leadership inverted the Division’s mission — dropping core matters and treating DOJ like a loyalty shop instead of a constitutional one.#1374355
• The “protector” posture: the same reporting describes Trump casting himself as the “protector of white people…at home and abroad.”
Yes, Title VII protects everyone from discrimination, including whites. That’s not the issue. The issue is when “very badly treated” becomes a governing premise so civil-rights law gets repurposed from a backstop against exclusion into a tool for rollback.
Question: If the goal is merit and equal treatment, what evidence would show these agencies are enforcing neutral standards—rather than reallocating enforcement toward one political story?
⸻
##Sources:
- https://thegrio.com/2026/01/12/trump-says-civil-rights-act-led-to-white-people-being-very-badly-treated/
— Accessible recap of the NYT interview: “very badly treated,” “reverse discrimination,” plus the “protector of white people…at home and abroad” framing. - https://x.com/andrealucasEEOC/status/2001439099907961012
— EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas video/post: “Are you a white male…?” call to file discrimination claims. - https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-dei-related-discrimination-work
— EEOC’s official DEI-related discrimination FAQ/technical assistance (how Title VII is being applied to DEI). - https://www.thejusticeconnection.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Civil-Rights-Division-Sign-On-Letter.pdf
— Dec. 9, 2025 sign-on letter from former DOJ Civil Rights Division staff alleging mission inversion and “loyalty…not the Constitution.” - https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964
— Title VII statutory text (anchor for “Title VII protects everyone” concession).
Well if we measure everyone's test scores, it's going to be Asian, white, light hispanic, dark hispanic, black. That should be taken as evidence of a merit-based non-discriminating system, but the people on the lower range feel differently.
Merrill and Kemper understood this 60 years ago #1289513: if you only measure what the privileged can easily accumulate, you’ll keep selecting the privileged. ‘Race-neutral’ doesn’t discover merit. It stops looking for it.
https://twiiit.com/andrealucasEEOC/status/2001439099907961012