pull down to refresh
The video you provided was after the officer shot her. She was incapacitated by the officer at the point your video starts. Here is a clearer view of the entire incident.
https://x.com/bnonews/status/2008966410039644438?s=46&t=jaSyfq3_urhf6FemD9yAuQ
Literally shows her hitting the accelerator AND THEN the shots fired, turn up your sound.
Saw that other video too.. including where they immediately signaled for a medic and he came running with his kit, contrary to your other TDS fake claim: #1406095
Here's the ICE agent "defending himself" by shooting into the driver's side window of a car that's pulling away from him.
First shot he was in the front,
Car at that point was already used as a weapon
2nd 3rd shots after he was knocked aside, vehicle still accelerating, threat not disabled
Maybe stop encouraging deranged TDS women to do stupid shit?
If she was accelerating at him, physics says he doesn’t get to just stand there, plant, aim, and fire multiple controlled shots. At 20 mph a car covers ~30 feet per second. You're diving out of the lane or you’re getting hit, not calmly posting up and sending rounds. And even if your first-shot story is right, deadly force is about imminent threat; continuing to fire as the car is fleeing is a different question that needs video + an independent timeline. Also, “deranged women married to the state” isn’t analysis. It's dehumanization. I wrote about that pattern this morning.
#1405903
30 feet per second
Are you retarded or just that dishonest and deranged?
He was right in front of the hood, in contact with, no feet of separation to cover... when she hit the gas, undeniable footage of that.
One shot was from the front as he was being pushed, wasn't planted. Planted aim shots were after already evading the vehicle.
imminent threat
vehicle was already used as a weapon, still under acceleration with other agents in the street/harms way. Plenty of precedent here in favor of the agent.
Was it smart? Probably not, but under the circumstances will be justified. The situation was created by incitement.
dehumanization
You'd know a lot about that, that's exactly why this shit happens, globalist puppet fake news narratives about ICE/CBP
I'm acknowledging she's a victim, just not of ICE, but the psychological operations against you're perpetuating.
Even if the first shot happened with the agent on the hood (an imminent-threat moment), nothing I’ve seen shows that clearly. The real question is after separation: were rounds fired once the car was moving away / no longer an imminent threat to that officer (with bystanders in the street)? In the screenshot I posted, the vehicle appears already past him and he’s upright, planted, firing toward the rear/side, not pinned.
Also, “30 ft/sec” doesn’t describe the contact moment. If he’s on the bumper, speed is zero. The relevant part is the transition: once he can plant/aim, there’s time + distance, and “imminent threat” gets thinner unless the video shows an ongoing threat to someone else.
So what’s your limiting principle? when does lethal force have to stop once the threat isn’t imminent anymore?
nothing I’ve seen shows that clearly
Either need to get your vision checked or take your lithium, TDS impeding your perception. It's clear as day.
were rounds fired once the car was moving away
Yes, absolutely. This is also very clear.
no longer an imminent threat
Just because he was to the side (after already being struck) doesn't mean the threat is no longer imminent.
I'd like to think I wouldn't have taken those 2nd and 3rd shots, but adrenaline is a bitch... As a matter of legality, there's plenty of precedent on this. Deadly force is justified until a weaponized vehicle is stopped.
Clear as day she tried to mow down an agent, fake news TDS getting people killed.
view on x.comInsurrection Act would solve the coordination problem with administration in foreign occupied cities