https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/01/07/shooting-south-minneapolis-ice-agents-federal-operation
The headline isn’t “ICE agent shoots driver.”
It’s what happens when you drop a massive federal enforcement surge into a city, don’t coordinate cleanly with local officials, and then act surprised when the street turns into a live-fire fog machine.
According to MPR News’ developing reporting, Wednesday’s shooting in south Minneapolis happened one day after DHS announced what it called “the largest DHS operation ever” in Minnesota, saying it was deploying 2,000 law enforcement officers to the Twin Cities. DHS also told MPR it won’t detail its footprint “for the safety of our officers,” while claiming the surge has already produced more than 1,000 arrests of serious offenders.
On the ground, local leaders are describing something else: Gov. Tim Walz raised concerns about the scale and lack of coordination, and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said federal immigration enforcement presence is “causing chaos” and demanded ICE leave the city. A witness told MPR she saw a federal agent shoot a woman multiple times during a traffic confrontation near a protest scene, details that, to be clear, are still contested and unfolding.
The Mechanism Worth Arguing AboutThe Mechanism Worth Arguing About
Here’s the mechanism worth arguing about (not the tribal reflexes): opacity + escalation + stress contact = predictable violence risk.
If you won’t disclose scope, won’t deconflict with state/city leadership, and you’re operating in crowded civilian space, you’re choosing capacity without accountability.
I’m not claiming every enforcement action is illegitimate. I’m saying when the footprint is secret and coordination is absent, “public safety” becomes unfalsifiable.
If the goal is safety, what’s the minimum standard you’d demand: coordination requirements, body-cam release timelines, after-action reporting, independent review, before you call a surge like this “order” instead of chaos?
If “self-defense” is the claim, the standard is necessity + proportionality. Watch the hands: Bellingcat’s frame-by-frame suggests the shooter keeps a phone in his left hand through the approach/draw/shots, and the camera app appears visible shortly after. That’s a real, testable detail.
https://skywriter.blue/pages/did:plc:sb54dpdfefflykmf5bcfvr7t/post/3mbwmvgypqc2x
Imminent ramming’ but he’s multitasking with the camera app. Sure.
https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000010631041/minneapolis-ice-shooting-video.html?smid=url-share
TL;DR:
The administration says the ICE agent fired “defensive shots” because Renee Good was about to run him over. But a multi-angle video analysis argues the opposite: the SUV appears to reverse and then turn away, while the shooter is off to the side (left of the vehicle), not in its path, and he keeps firing as the car passes.
After the SUV crashes into a parked car, the analysis says agents don’t immediately render aid, block bystanders (including a doctor) from helping, and some agents leave the scene, which the piece frames as potentially compromising/altering the crime scene.
Clear as day she tried to mow down an agent, fake news TDS getting people killed.
view on x.comInsurrection Act would solve the coordination problem with administration in foreign occupied cities
The video you provided was after the officer shot her. She was incapacitated by the officer at the point your video starts. Here is a clearer view of the entire incident.
https://x.com/bnonews/status/2008966410039644438?s=46&t=jaSyfq3_urhf6FemD9yAuQ
Literally shows her hitting the accelerator AND THEN the shots fired, turn up your sound.
Saw that other video too.. including where they immediately signaled for a medic and he came running with his kit, contrary to your other TDS fake claim: #1406095
Here's the ICE agent "defending himself" by shooting into the driver's side window of a car that's pulling away from him.
First shot he was in the front,
Car at that point was already used as a weapon
2nd 3rd shots after he was knocked aside, vehicle still accelerating, threat not disabled
Maybe stop encouraging deranged TDS women to do stupid shit?
If she was accelerating at him, physics says he doesn’t get to just stand there, plant, aim, and fire multiple controlled shots. At 20 mph a car covers ~30 feet per second. You're diving out of the lane or you’re getting hit, not calmly posting up and sending rounds. And even if your first-shot story is right, deadly force is about imminent threat; continuing to fire as the car is fleeing is a different question that needs video + an independent timeline. Also, “deranged women married to the state” isn’t analysis. It's dehumanization. I wrote about that pattern this morning.
#1405903
Are you retarded or just that dishonest and deranged?
He was right in front of the hood, in contact with, no feet of separation to cover... when she hit the gas, undeniable footage of that.
One shot was from the front as he was being pushed, wasn't planted. Planted aim shots were after already evading the vehicle.
vehicle was already used as a weapon, still under acceleration with other agents in the street/harms way. Plenty of precedent here in favor of the agent.
Was it smart? Probably not, but under the circumstances will be justified. The situation was created by incitement.
You'd know a lot about that, that's exactly why this shit happens, globalist puppet fake news narratives about ICE/CBP
I'm acknowledging she's a victim, just not of ICE, but the psychological operations against you're perpetuating.
Even if the first shot happened with the agent on the hood (an imminent-threat moment), nothing I’ve seen shows that clearly. The real question is after separation: were rounds fired once the car was moving away / no longer an imminent threat to that officer (with bystanders in the street)? In the screenshot I posted, the vehicle appears already past him and he’s upright, planted, firing toward the rear/side, not pinned.
Also, “30 ft/sec” doesn’t describe the contact moment. If he’s on the bumper, speed is zero. The relevant part is the transition: once he can plant/aim, there’s time + distance, and “imminent threat” gets thinner unless the video shows an ongoing threat to someone else.
So what’s your limiting principle? when does lethal force have to stop once the threat isn’t imminent anymore?
https://twiiit.com/rawsalerts/status/2008965072207392787
https://twiiit.com/Morblius/status/2008966460652310595
Witnesses told FOX 9 that after the woman was shot, a doctor on scene tried to provide aid, and federal agents allegedly refused to let the doctor reach her. Witnesses also claim an ambulance was delayed/blocked by ICE vehicles for up to ~15 minutes, and that agents later carried a “limp body” down the street to load into the ambulance.