pull down to refresh
No, not according to Dutch law at the time.
Owners don't lose ownership over the property, they only lose access.
Squatters were protected by law when the space was vacant for over a year.
Like.. do these places have any legitimate owners? Or is it like a property of the state?
If legitimate owners, do you have a mutual agreement that both parties consented to?
In some cases. In other cases not.
Yea, that's effectively a "no".
Commercial banks and the central bank take advantage of stupid laws to steal property from people in the form of purchasing power.
You take advantage of stupid laws to steal property from people in the form of housing.
You're no different. Just a common thief. You belong in prison with the rest of the criminal scum.
You're no Bitcoiner. We respect private property. You are the enemy.
Sir, I understand you have your opinions, but this kind of abusive talk is really not okay. I'm gonna put you on mute.
Don't take other people's shit
I don't care about Dutch law.
Are you preventing legitimate owners of property from enjoying their property the way they see fit?
Are you violating other people's private property rights with this?