pull down to refresh

A new WSJ report exposes the dragon's glaring fracture. The country is racing to catch up with the US in chips and AI, but is funding this by draining resources from the population and creating a trillion-dollar debt.

It's not a question of imminent collapse, it's a choice of priorities: "We will have the best technology, whatever the cost to the people."

See some bizarre stories from the most complex country in the world!

2️⃣ The "Cyberpunk" Scenario (Cutting-Edge Technology vs. Stagnant Life)

China is currently experiencing an economic dystopia:

• At the top: the government has infinite resources to launch the world's most modern aircraft carrier and AIs (DeepSeek) that rival Silicon Valley.

• At the bottom: the middle class sees its main savings (real estate) turn to dust.

The State channels all wealth into the "industry of the future," leaving the present (consumption and services) adrift.

3️⃣ The Black Hole: Deflation

While the world struggles with inflation, China has fallen into the opposite: deflation.

Prices have been falling for more than 37 consecutive months.

Factories are charging less and less because there is oversupply. The reason?

🏠 Real Estate: Prices have fallen 17% since the pandemic. As 70% of Chinese families' assets are in this sector, the "wealth effect" has evaporated.

The Chinese feel poorer and tighten their purse strings, hindering the circulation of money in retail.

4️⃣ The Mountain of Waste (The Case of EVs)

Beijing's order is political, not economic.

The government mandated leadership in the electric car sector, generating a flood of blind capital:

🚗 The Fact: In 2023, there were 129 EV brands in China.

📉 The Reality: The consulting firm AlixPartners projects that only 15 will be viable by 2030.

The rest is capital burned in suicidal price wars, financed by public debt.

5️⃣ The "EV Graveyards" (The Subsidy Fraud)

The market obeyed the order in the worst way: creating phantom supply.

Satellite images revealed gigantic fields with thousands of brand-new EVs abandoned and rotting.

Why? To defraud the subsidy.

Car manufacturers produced cars, "sold" them to shell companies, pocketed the government money, and left the car in the bush.

Of the ~500 brands that emerged in 2019, most have already disappeared.

6️⃣ "Zombie Companies" (The NIO Case)

The WSJ highlights the EV manufacturer NIO as the symbol of this model.

Between 2020 and 2024, NIO had losses of US$10 billion. In a normal market, it would have gone bankrupt. In China, state-owned companies injected another US$1 billion to save the operation.

The government prefers to artificially keep loss-making companies alive at the expense of the population rather than admit market consolidation, generating global excess capacity.

7️⃣ The Human Cost (The Mianchi Case)

The most didactic example of distortion: Mianchi, a rural county, decided to act as a state-owned "Venture Capital":

  • They increased spending on Tech by 50% to buy stakes in chip factories and create robotics parks.
  • But the city's revenue fell by 10%.

As a consequence, the money ran out.

The local government defaulted on the salaries of teachers and garbage collectors to continue funding the tech startups.

8️⃣ The "Big Fund" (Chips) Corruption

Recent success in chips came despite corruption.

The "Big Fund" (state semiconductor fund) received US$50 billion to invest.

The result? In 2022, the government arrested the head of the fund and several executives.

They used the money to inflate the stock prices of friends and invest in shell companies, not in R&D.

Billions evaporated before the government cleaned house and focused on SMIC, the country's largest chip manufacturer.

9️⃣ The Employment Dilemma (Tech doesn't employ the masses)

The government focuses on "High-Quality Productive Forces," but these sectors generate a social problem:

• SMIC (Chips): ~20,000 employees.

• UBTech (Robots): ~2,000 employees.

Meanwhile, in addition to the impaired income factor (as mentioned in tweet 3), 1 in 6 young people in cities are unemployed. Robot factories do not generate jobs for millions of recent graduates.

🔟 Solar Panels: The Toxic Excess

China currently produces twice as many solar panels as the entire world can install.

This has created such a brutal price war that leading companies in the sector (like Longi) have seen their profits plummet.

They built factories to meet a demand that doesn't exist, just to meet local GDP targets and maintain artificial jobs.

1️⃣1️⃣ Echoes of the Past (Mao vs. Xi)

The article draws a historical parallel.

In the 1950s, Mao Zedong ordered the country to obsessively focus on steel production, neglecting agriculture.

The result was famine, with much useless steel production (even today).

Now, Xi Jinping obsessively focuses on chips and AI, neglecting household consumption.

Resources are greater today, but the logic of "political will over economic efficiency" remains the same.

1️⃣2️⃣ The Other Side: The Price of Sovereignty

Despite inefficiency and waste, China is closing the gap with the US. By throwing trillions at the problem, they are forcing evolution through force.

If China reaches the Moon in 2030 (as planned), masters AI, and has the only space station in orbit, all this social and financial cost will guarantee complete sovereignty for the second half of the 21st century.

It's a very long-term gamble.

1️⃣3️⃣ The Final Logic: Security > Economy

Why persist in error?

Because Xi's priority is not GDP, it's National Security.

China accepts doubling its debt (which has reached US$23 trillion) and having internal inefficiency, as long as it guarantees that the US cannot "shut down" its economy with sanctions.

It's the price of insurance against the West.

China is exporting its crisis: lacking domestic consumption, it floods the world with cheap products (deflationary exports), affecting global industries and commodities.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 3h

Interesting angle. I usually see positive analysis on how China is overtaking the US in xyz...

The government prefers to artificially keep loss-making companies alive at the expense of the population rather than admit market consolidation, generating global excess capacity.

This one I'm not sure about. They are letting "too big to fail" real estate empires default. The people know that the government will not save them and they accept it. I've heard of real estate crash in large cities like Guangzhou of apartment prices going back to 2017 levels (50% drop). Where I am in Australia I wonder if people could even stomach a 20% drop without it all collapsing.

reply
reply

Have you heard of the saying 'eating bitter' ?

China and its political structure would appear to have a higher tolerance and capacity to endure suffering and sacrifice in the already commenced contest for global supremacy.

If you read history you will know that since 1840 and The Opium Wars Chinas sovereignty was inflicted multiple attacks and incursions.

Over the following 100 years China was a shambolic mess and this is known as the 100 years of humiliation- culminating in the murderous WW2 occupation of Eastern China by Japan. Read about the Massacre of Nanjing if you have time and stomach for it.

Since WW2 the CCP under Mao began a gradual, brutal quest to reconfigure Chinese culture to point where it is capable of responding to western imperialism in a manner that can successfully allow the continued security and development of China under Chinese leadership and true sovereignty.

High on the list of early imperatives was getting nukes and getting Tibet so US could not position nukes right over China...

Tell me this- how many nations today enjoy true and full sovereignty?

Japan?
Europe?
UK?
Canada, Australia, New Zealand?
S.Korea?
All the above are monetarily and militarily subservient tribute states to the US military industrial combine
.
The rest of the world?

I would suggest currently are either under US or Chinese tribute...or in an often precarious 'non-aligned' category.

Again- Tell me this- how many nations today enjoy true and full sovereignty?

I say only China and the US can be said to enjoy full and true self determination.

What do you say?

China aims to rebuild, maintain and develop under true sovereignty and to understand that ambition you must understand what it implies.
It is a lofty aim and one few if any other cultures have or can achieve- what it almost certainly requires is to confront the USA and gain a position of either domination or equality with US imperialism.

If you think that can be achieved easily then go back to read history again.
This is the contest of the 21 century and many of the trends suggest China may succeed.

In part it will depend upon how resilient both Chinese and US populations are.

How much their citizens are prepared and able to sacrifice and suffer in the name of gaining true and ongoing self determination.

Again I would suggest China may have a substantial advantage here as many US citizens appear obese, unaware and ill-informed of history and hugely arrogant and ignorant of the way the US is seen by many of the nations and cultures it has subjugated in one way or another.

Most educated Chinese are well aware of what The Opium Wars were and of what the modern Chinese government is seeking to achieve- the same cannot be said for the vast majority of US citizens I have encountered in this dialogue.

reply