The US administration is finalizing its 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which must pass by the end of this year. One provision of the bill would impose a 10-year moratorium(new window) on state-level regulation of AI. This would effectively halt any state’s ability to control how AI tools collect data or generate responses for their residents.The same moratorium was rejected in July 2025(new window) as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. But this time the administration is ready with a backup plan: If the moratorium doesn’t pass as part of the NDAA, the Trump administration has already drafted an executive order that would try to force states to scrap any AI regulations of their own.At Proton, we believe regulation is an effective tool to protect people, and a federal standard is the right way to go. In a fiercely divided political climate, a single federal law would streamline AI regulation, preventing fragmented protections across states, and making the rules much more clear. But erasing state laws before proposing any federal alternative would be worse. Big Tech would be able to operate without guardrails, putting everyone’s safety and privacy at risk.
pull down to refresh
related posts
164 sats \ 3 replies \ @kepford 8h
Oh brother. If people think that the politicians that are funded by the AI companies will actually protect the people... I have some real-estate to sell you.
reply
2 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 8h
I don’t expect anything from politicians. Last week: Trump Takes Aim at State AI Laws in Draft Executive Order #1287090
reply
28 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 8h
I do. I expect them to follow the incentives. Reelection and power.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @itsrealfake 6h
it's probably >50x more expensive to prevent all states from protecting their constituents than it is to prevent the federal government from doing so.
reply