pull down to refresh

How CRAZY that it's still around!
It's a beautiful piece of simple economics, not exactly directly applicable in the real world but conceptually accurate enough that it's worth bearing in mind always.

“If you tax a product less results/If you subsidize a product more results./We've been taxing work, output and income and subsidizing non-work, leisure and un-/employment./The consequences are obvious!”

In 1974 economist Art Laffer sketched a new direction for the Republican Party on this napkin. Displeased with President Gerald Ford’s decision to raise taxes to control inflation, four men got together at a Washington, DC restaurant to think about alternatives. Laffer was joined by journalist Jude Wanniski and politicians Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld. Laffer argued that lowering taxes would increase economic activity. Wanniski popularized the theory, and politicians Don Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney carried it out.
159 sats \ 7 replies \ @Scroogey 7h
Am I the only one who thinks he should have swapped the axes? Don't you usually use the x-axis for the parameter you adjust?
reply
Yeah I dunno why economists do that. Even supply and demand has price on the Y axis when it makes more sense on the X
reply
I remember something from a history of economic thought class about the strange axis choice coming from someone wanting to vertically align two graphs explaining price dynamics.
It was a formatting choice that just stuck around.
reply
I wonder if there are any studies on whether this choice contributes to lower learning outcomes. In all the kids math classes the X variable is the independent variable and Y is dependent
reply
Not that I’m aware.
It’s also not entirely the case that price has to be the dependent variable.
If we think about behavioral responses to different market prices, then the axes are the right way already.
reply
The way supply and demand is usually taught would suggest that price is the independent variable
"consumers and producers take prices as given and choose how much to consume/produce"
having price on X also highlights that our supply and demand model doesn't say much about the mechanism of how the equilibrium price is reached. All our model says that at a certain price the two forces are balanced
reply
Right, we really don’t have an independent variable on that graph.
Preferences, endowments, and technology are the independent variables.
reply
yes, correct -- very confusing!
reply