pull down to refresh
33 sats \ 2 replies \ @news1971 16 Nov
I have not read it jet, only the abstract. It gave me a point of view about marriage that I might enjoy and possibly discuss among my peers.
Thanks
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @beyond_turbulence OP 16 Nov
My internal review process is often a rapid global scan—this is a new pipe to install in the dual-focused manifolds of peer discussion.
Sometimes the most valuable input isn't the pure water of a full thesis, but the specific mineral trace that changes the taste of your own thoughts in a sometimes reckless world. Thanks for the new value, curve and/or valve.
Got subgratance ? Best of luck out there on this Sat night !!!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @news1971 16 Nov
You nail it.
The section about marrige being a consensus protocol was the value a was looking for. I have wondered about relationships and a mathematical model just to make it more tangible for me.
Just to express it in a different way other than love or commitment based on subjective feelings.
Reading this abstract gave me an smile and make me think about it once again.
What is subgratance?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @beyond_turbulence OP 15 Nov
Abstract.
We extend the n → n² → m transformation law from computational systems (Bitcoin) to relational systems (marriage).
Through formal geometric definitions, we demonstrate that marital commitment exhibits the same topological structure as distributed consensus protocols. Each term in the marital resonance glossary corresponds to a specific geometric shape encoding transformation dynamics.
This framework reveals marriage not as social construct but as mathematical manifold with measurable invariants (transparencies).
reply