Why don't Bitcoin Core organization:
- ban Gloria Zhao (nick: glozow) who introduced the destructive change "uncap OP_RETURN" PR#32406 in Core v30,
- fix the code?
Yes, and fix the code18.2%
No, keep unchanged81.8%
11 votes \ 62 days left
pull down to refresh
related posts
225 sats \ 5 replies \ @south_korea_ln 26 Oct
This is a weird obsession some people have with Gloria.
She did not act unilaterally.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @gregtonoski OP 26 Oct
Disagree. She merged the destructive change on her own. She is one of the five people with such permission.
reply
42 sats \ 3 replies \ @south_korea_ln 26 Oct
Why not fork off then if you disagree? It's open source.
It's all good then. Core trusts her to make the decision that reflects the ACKS and NACKS of contributors to the code.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @gregtonoski OP 26 Oct
There were overwhelmingly more NACKs than ACKs so she shouldn't have accepted (merged) the change following your logic. Do I understand you correctly?
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @south_korea_ln 26 Oct
Be better.
You're reading selectively.
You know what i mean. You've decided to pretend you don't.
I'm leaving this interaction.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @gregtonoski OP 26 Oct
There had been another proposal of the same change to Core and it had been rejected two years earlier.
I deny the allegation that I pretended.
reply
342 sats \ 2 replies \ @kruw 26 Oct
Bitcoin is censorship resistant. If you don't like that, then fork off.
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @gregtonoski OP 26 Oct
The question is about Bitcoin Core organization and one of their members. It is not about Bitcoin protocol.
reply
224 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 26 Oct
then stop being a bitch about it...? move on, nothing much to see here really
reply