Why don't Bitcoin Core organization:
- ban Gloria Zhao (nick: glozow) who introduced the destructive change "uncap OP_RETURN" PR#32406 in Core v30,
- fix the code?
Yes, and fix the code18.2%
No, keep unchanged81.8%
11 votes \ 10 days left
pull down to refresh
related posts
This is a weird obsession some people have with Gloria.
She did not act unilaterally.
Disagree. She merged the destructive change on her own. She is one of the five people with such permission.
Why not fork off then if you disagree? It's open source.
It's all good then. Core trusts her to make the decision that reflects the ACKS and NACKS of contributors to the code.
There were overwhelmingly more NACKs than ACKs so she shouldn't have accepted (merged) the change following your logic. Do I understand you correctly?
Be better.
You're reading selectively.
You know what i mean. You've decided to pretend you don't.
I'm leaving this interaction.
There had been another proposal of the same change to Core and it had been rejected two years earlier.
I deny the allegation that I pretended.
Bitcoin is censorship resistant. If you don't like that, then fork off.
The question is about Bitcoin Core organization and one of their members. It is not about Bitcoin protocol.
then stop being a bitch about it...? move on, nothing much to see here really