pull down to refresh

Philosophy is the inevitable future of humanity. The present is _ techne_, in other words the totality of activities through which man removes more and more pain and limitation. “Science” (which is the most powerful instrument that techne possesses today) has achieved results because of the abandonment of the ancient category of episteme, in a word, the renunciation of the position of being absolute and irreversible truth. Today, “science” may have not only the aim of constructing—I emphasize, constructing—man, but it may also have the aim of removing from man any kind of limitation, and even of constructing God, which in other times was taken as something to be contemplated with worship.
But precisely because “science” has renounced being truth, any degree of perfection and happiness toward which it claims to lead man cannot be lived except as something unstable, which can be lost at any moment. The more desirable that life which techne can build, the more unsatisfying is every logic, possessed by techne, that is put to work with the aim of achieving perfection or at least stability of what has been built. Techne may remove from you any kind of limitation, but not that which consists in the doubt that everything you are or have can also be swallowed up by a nearby catastrophe. Only the logic of truth—I mean, only an absolute and irreversible answer—can remove the doubt. Precisely for this reason, philosophy is the future of man; who, when he arrives at the point of believing himself to be lord of being, will feel, through an impulse that has never before crossed him, the need to know the truth of this belief on his part, and consequently, what is most important, the need to know what truth is.
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 5h
From a Thomistic view:
Ontology = The study of what is.
Epistemology = The study of how we know what is.
Aquinas would posit that our sciences are the epistemological process of how we come to know God . That is, it is through our experimentation and discoveries that we come to understand the true ontology of the world. The epistemological reveals the ontological (and ultimately God is what is)
There is no God vs Science dichotomy in the Thomistic view. Since the furthering of science furthers our understanding of God.
This was the view held during most of the world. It has only been in the last century where man as intentionally sought to create a division between the two (and look where its gotten us).
The big bang was discovered by a Jesuit priest (Lemaître). The entire concept of genetics was started by a monk (Mendel). The notion of the order of the solar system was discovered by church official (Copernicus).
I do agree with your point that Philosophy is very under-rated currently. Curiously I think this age of LLM / AI is going to bring its resurgence. Because ultimately its impossible to delve deeply into the notions of consciousness without understanding its philosophical underpinnings.
reply
That's an interesting thought. It makes me wonder if there are cycles to our relationship with truth: i.e
Having a sense of absolute truth is valuable, but we're often going to be wrong in our beliefs. Once some threshold is reached, the culture changes to one of more exploration and experimentation to discover what we were missing. But, when some critical mass of new truths are revealed we cease experimenting and try to live in accord with the new truths.
reply
Cycles sounds likely. We are definitely in a post-truth moment. But we may have reached a nadir and are now recovering a desire for truth.
I have read some social commentary about how the early 20th century was like a high point for "truth", and there were many dreams of scientific utopianism... and probably communism itself sprang from that kind of thinking. But the devastation of the two world wars turned society in the other direction. We saw the dangers of such absolutism and turned against it. But now we've become too relativistic.
reply
The lack of major scientific advancements is probably taking some of the luster off.
Most of the field-defining advancements came in or before the early 20th century: genetics, relativity, tectonics, quantum mechanics, marginal utility theory, natural selection, chemistry.
Since then, we've mostly been tinkering around the edges.
reply