pull down to refresh

[bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes Multiparty Protocols DoS More Expensivelists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2023-January/021322.html
703 sats \ 7 comments \ @k00b 10 Jan 2023 bitcoin
related
A bit confused around Full RBF
542 sats \ 53 comments \ @fanis 13 Nov 2022 bitcoin
RBF and congestion
123 sats \ 4 comments \ @l0k18 14 May 2023 bitcoin
RBF: Replace-By-Fee explained simply
643 sats \ 2 comments \ @BTCillustrated 8 Nov 2024 bitcoin
How to Use Full RBF
10.7k sats \ 2 comments \ @nerd2ninja 7 Nov 2022 bitcoin
[bitcoin-dev] tbast on Improving RBF Policylists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-January/019841.html
43 sats \ 1 comment \ @k00b 1 Feb 2022 bitcoin
Why You Should Run Full-RBF On Your Nodepetertodd.org/2023/why-you-should-run-mempoolfullrbf
1047 sats \ 18 comments \ @petertodd 8 Feb 2023 bitcoin
Full-RBF in Bitcoin Corefanismichalakis.fr/posts/fullrbf/
300 sats \ 2 comments \ @fanis 12 Jul 2022 bitcoin
[bitcoin-dev] Playing with full-rbf peers for fun and L2s securitylists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-June/020557.html
31 sats \ 0 comments \ @k00b 14 Jun 2022 bitcoin
RBF transactions larger in size than its predecessors and non-RBF transactionsbitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/122473/are-rbf-transactions-on-average-larger-in-size-than-its-predecessors-and-than-no
196 sats \ 0 comments \ @RideandSmile 29 Apr 2024 bitdevs
Tweet thread: Why is full-rbf in the news? The upcoming Bitcoin Core v24.0twitter.com/peterktodd/status/1588466098005069824
2292 sats \ 12 comments \ @petertodd 4 Nov 2022 bitcoin
[bitcoin-dev] Analysis of full-RBF deployment methodslists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-October/021075.html
42 sats \ 0 comments \ @k00b 27 Oct 2022 bitcoin
policy: enable full-rbf by default by 1440000bytes · Bitcoin Coregithub.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30493
21 sats \ 0 comments \ @Rsync25 20 Jul 2024 bitdevs
full-RBF by default in Bitcoin Core v28github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30493
2036 sats \ 10 comments \ @0xB10C 5 Aug 2024 bitcoin
Over 70% of hash power has enabled Full-RBF; Bitcoin Core has notgithub.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28132
6490 sats \ 22 comments \ @petertodd 16 Feb 2024 bitcoin
[bitcoin-dev] 17% of Bitcoin Core 24.x listening nodes are running full-rbflists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-December/021296.html
144 sats \ 2 comments \ @k00b 23 Dec 2022 bitcoin
policy: Enable full-rbf by default by petertoddgithub.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28132/files
1500 sats \ 4 comments \ @Rsync25 30 Jul 2023 bitcoin
Notes on 'DoS due to inv-to-send sets growing too large' from May 2023b10c.me/observations/15-inv-to-send-queue/
11.5k sats \ 3 comments \ @0xB10C 24 Jun bitcoin
Disadvantages of replace-by-fee policy.
43 sats \ 2 comments \ @BTCLNAT 8 Oct 2024 bitcoin_beginners
Replace-by-fee (RBF), explained 📙
21 sats \ 0 comments \ @0xbitcoiner 30 Nov 2023 bitcoin
Bringing a nuke to a knife fight: Transaction introspection to stop RBF pinninglists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-May/020458.html
123 sats \ 0 comments \ @pony 11 May 2022 bitcoin
[bitcoin-dev] Full-RBF testing: ≥31% of hash power, ≥4 pools, is mining full-RBFlists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2023-August/021890.html
2978 sats \ 7 comments \ @petertodd 16 Aug 2023 bitcoin