pull down to refresh

Follow up proposal for private liquidity
35 sats \ 1 comment \ @DarthCoin 5 Jan 2023 bitcoin
In a follow up of my initial proposal about creating a liquidity flow for businesses, I wrote these:
I would like more people start testing these scenarios, first in a private mode, with trusted users, then slowly expand it to more users.
It could be a way to really use that big liquidity we have now in RoF but is not really used for real life use case scenarios.
Please pay attention to my articles and guides, if you are a LSP with good liquidity and /or a group of LN nodes that want to offer such services, you should try it. More users would need such liquidity and both sides will help each others: you get fees, users get liquidity.
write
preview
related posts
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @fairstack 15 Apr
I have commented a question on your substack post
https://darthcoin.substack.com/p/private-lightning-nodes/comments?utm_source=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
I paste it here for discussion and it is regarding to "how to fund your private ln node/bank with most possible privacy":
I appreciate your guides, well done! What would you recommend how is the best way in terms of privacy to create a channel on your own ln node (raspiblitz + RTL). RTL supports Taproot which I understand hides the fact that a ln channel is created. But when i fund it from an on-chain address of my cold wallet that was funded from a central KYC exchange it is still connected with the exchange user account indirectly. Or is better to use another way via lightning. So first swap from my on-chain to ln (wait for a few days and split the sats), then swap some amount to on-chain then fund the channel of the own node?
reply