pull down to refresh

I work at Bitkit, a self-custodial Lightning and on-chain wallet designed to feel as easy as custodial. Yet we see the same pattern: some bitcoiners are fine with custodial, some won’t touch it, and others base it on the amount.
I’m in the “don’t give custodians and old ways an inch” camp, but I get the convenience factor.
What’s your line? A spending balance, a percentage of your stack, or zero?
121 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 19h
I don't use custodial wallets anymore. I did use the SN wallet back in the day, and I have to admit I would have probably used the primal wallet for nostr zapping, but it isn't available where I live. I think alby hub made a big difference in convenience for me. Now I use my own nodes for everything.
reply
Do you run a full LN node? or in-app node like in Bitkit?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 19h
I run full nodes. I'm not opposed to in app ones like what you guys have. In fact, I think you have a great product.
reply
Cool. thanks!
reply
138 sats \ 2 replies \ @Scoresby 20h
Well, the obligatory answer here is: nice try, fed.
But If i was feeling risky, I'd say less than 50k sats.
reply
Lol. So if you have 50k sats and plan on using them to spend, you rather have them in a custodial wallet?
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 20h
I'd be willing to have them in a custodial wallet. Pretty much my main use case for custodial right now is zaps, though. If you don't want to run an always-on node, you set up a custodial wallet for zaps.
But other than that use case, I just use something like phoenix or zeus: so "rather" isn't the right word.
reply
5-10% of my total stack.
reply
23 sats \ 1 reply \ @teemupleb 16h
Sounds like a lot. Then you have to be actively reading the updates to their terms of service etc. Losing 10% of the stack in the worst case scenario would hurt a lot.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @fiatbad 4h
Yea, you're right. I had originally just written "5%". I added the 10 as an afterthought.
I guess 3-5% is more to my taste.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 20h
Why would yo use custodians? Unless you really can't afford a channel.
reply
Well, that and also not understanding the differences I guess.
reply
I believe we can allow custodians up to 10-20k sats. More than that is playing with risk.
reply
Ok, but why? just for convenience? Do you still feel that self-custody makes that much of a difference in UX?
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @here8ic 20h
The problem is not how much, but that you end up getting lazy and instead of supporting self-custodial developement like you guys, we end up supporting "bitcoin banks" which is a step back. So zero es the right answer.
reply
That is very true. But playing devils advocate, do we need both?
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 20h
I really enjoy Bitkit, great work there! For me, it depends on who is using it. If it is my mom, then custodial is ok below 25 usd. If you understand wha you are doing, full self custodial.
reply
Hey, thanks!
Ok.. I guess my mom is not yet ready even for custodial ;)
reply
about 30 bucks worth is my mental limit of what i would be willing to lose. if it was an ecash wallet, it would be less, like 10 bucks max
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 2h
I don’t use custodial wallets at all but may keep a few sats on exchanges while buying. So max would be once I bought the amount I wanted to buy then move it all to self custody.
reply
I have small amounts in various custodial wallets to make lightning easy. Wallet of Satoshi, Coinos, as well as some exchanges that have lightning. I've recently checkout out bitkit and it seems to be the best and easiest implementation of a self-custodial lightning wallet I've seen. I don't use lightning enough to justify opening a channel. But using Stacker news and getting frequent small amounts of sats, I might use your app soon for this.
reply
In my case, I use the Community's custodial wallet, where I only keep very basic funds—up to 10k SAT, and sometimes less. I use Phoenix as a self-custody wallet because I live in a country with probably one of the worst internet connections out there. I was using Blixt, but I had to stop because of synchronization issues. However, I am in favor of full self-custody. Even for merchants who want to run their own node with their own LNbits to manage multiple wallets and extensions, the suggestion here is Phoenixd + LNbits on a VPS.
reply
I have been playing around with Bitkit since you posted. I received this message:
Bitkit does not currently provide lightning services in your country...
Does bitkit not provide lightning services in the US?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 12h
I use Rizful for my NWC connections. I try not to keep more than 10k sats in there. Might be a bit conservative but its new tech.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DannyM 13h
I consider cashu custodial as well, and I would feel paranoid about my sats disaeppearing if I held more than 20,000 in cashu.
reply
I mean... I don't need one but if I had no other option I wouldn't trust any more than what I carry in cash (USD) in my pocket. Not much. Enough for the day basically. I would never trust life changing levels to a custodian. Not a wallet or an exchange. But if people want to do that... its none of my business. People do dumb things every day.
reply
with bitkit individual transactions are limited to under USD999...so much for self sovereignty. with aggregate transactions up to a total of usd5000 1% routing fee is charged. 'until such time as the amount of Routed Payments made through a Blocktank Connection exceeds US$5,000 in value (in aggregate), an amount equal to 1% of the amount of the Routed Payment;' Thats a hell of a lot higher fees than I pay on coinos...imo bordering on usury.
Bitkit can close your 'self sovereignty' wallet at any time without notice or reason and can change the terms of use including fees charged without notice at any time - so much for self sovereignty.
Read the fucking fine print.
reply
You can use your own channels if you want to. Also, Bitkit is a spending wallet. You should not have more than 1K in any spending wallet. The rest should be on your cold wallet.
reply
I see no reason to move from coinos which offers far far lower fees and greater convenience- ie not reliant upon playstore - coinos can be used on any browser and on linux and given Bitkits T&Cs it hardly seems like anything even close to true self custody or self sovereignty- its just a rentseeking rip off in comparison to coinos.
reply
max 100 usd, then moving it to self LN nodes. Waiting for bolt12 on LND, let's see how it will change things.
reply
1sat=1sat that's what matters, not the expression of it in fiat shit.
reply
interesting.
reply
I use coinos because it is easy and the fees are almost zero and it has good liquidity. Will keep up to 100k sats on it though have channeled up to 500k through it. It makes spending sats easier now some retailers are accepting LN. Have not seen any lower fees LN wallet with the same liquidity. I support coinos because LN must be easy to use for wider MoE adoption.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 19h
Only for teaching someone about bitcoin for the first time, then no, shoudl be self-custodial. I haven't tried Bitkit but will give it a try today :)
reply
Ok.. makes some sense. Yeah, try it :) get.bitkit.to
reply