pull down to refresh

Inspired by Jason Lowry’s Softwar MIT thesis.
—-
2035 — Šiauliai Province, Lithuania
The first thing you learned living on the eastern edge of Europe was how to read the silences.
Auste Kavaliauskas had grown up parsing the gaps between what officials said and what her grandmother whispered over evening tea. When news anchors spoke of “routine military exercises,” Babushka would click her tongue and mutter about wolves circling the henhouse. The old woman had lived through occupations before—Soviet, Nazi, Soviet again. She knew the sound of boots approaching long before they appeared.
Now, standing in the converted root cellar beneath her family’s farmhouse, Auste wondered if her grandmother would have understood what they’d built down here. Rows of mining rigs hummed in climate-controlled darkness, their LED displays casting blue shadows across concrete walls that had once stored potatoes. The machines were frankenstein assemblages of reclaimed ASICs and salvaged cooling systems, connected by cables snaking between hand-welded frames like digital ivy.
“Border latency spiking,” she called to Matas, who was checking the backup power distribution. “Three pings per second from Kaliningrad. All masked.”
Matas Žukauskas didn’t look up. At sixty-two, he moved with the deliberate precision of someone who’d spent decades building things that had to work the first time. In another life, he’d designed wind farms across the Sahel, bringing power to communities that had never seen electric light. But corporations and warlords had a way of stealing infrastructure. Here, beneath Lithuanian soil, he was building something they couldn’t simply take.
Kamile Petravičius emerged from the equipment alcove, laptop balanced on technical manuals. Her screen showed a real-time map dotted with moving contacts. She’d flown surveillance over Donbas during the early days of that war, coming home with titanium screws in her spine and an unshakeable conviction that the next conflict would be fought with algorithms as much as artillery.
Ten days earlier, satellite photographs had shown Russian armor massing near the Suwalki Gap. The images had been leaked, analyzed, debated, and ultimately dismissed by officials determined to see exercises where others saw preparation. But the three people in this underground chamber had been planning for a different kind of war entirely.
Not bullets or bombs, but energy. Computation. Proof.
The lights died at 3:17 AM on a Tuesday. Auste woke instantly in the farmhouse kitchen, a lifetime of living on contested borders having trained her to sleep lightly. Her phone buzzed: Five substations. Synchronised blackout.
She was pulling on boots when Kamile called: “Grid attack. They hit primary feeds to Šiauliai, Panevėžys, three smaller hubs. This is it.”
The vault’s emergency lighting cast everything in red as Auste descended. The mining rigs continued their endless computation, fed by geothermal power tapped from a Soviet-era heating system her grandfather had upgraded. The sound was like mechanical thunder, white noise that had become as familiar as her heartbeat. Matas was already at the control station. “Coordination protocols are active. Signal went out.”
Three months earlier, they had distributed hardware packages to trusted contacts throughout Lithuania. Miners hidden in church basements and school computer labs, in Internet cafes and rural cooperatives. Each node small, unobtrusive, individually worthless. Together, they formed something unprecedented: distributed defense powered by proof-of-work consensus.
The theory was elegant. Bitcoin’s security model was based on economic incentives—it cost more to attack the network than could be gained by controlling it. What if that principle could be applied to national defense? What if aggression could be made mathematically prohibitive?
“Hash rate climbing,” Kamile reported. “Fifteen percent above baseline.”
Across the country, citizens were powering up mining equipment in response to the grid attack. Solar panels redirected from household use to computation. Hydroelectric generators spinning to full capacity. Even car batteries pressed into service, their stored energy transformed into mathematical proof. It wasn’t military response in any traditional sense. No jets, no troops. Instead, Lithuania was demonstrating defense through distributed consensus—the ability to prove, with cryptographic certainty, that the nation remained sovereign and uncompromised.
“Moscow will claim this is economic manipulation,” Matas said, monitoring news feeds.
“Let them. The blockchain doesn’t lie.” The world noticed.
By morning, #LithuaniaHashRate was trending. Reporters who’d never heard of mining difficulty were explaining proof-of-work to television audiences. The photographs went viral: elderly women in traditional dress feeding wood into biomass generators connected to mining rigs. Teenagers installing solar panels on church roofs. A grandmother and her eight-year-old grandson configuring a mining node in their apartment, the child’s laptop connected to a repurposed space heater. The caption, in Lithuanian and English: “Digital Resistance.” But the most important audience wasn’t watching social media.
“Drone reconnaissance has stopped,” Kamile reported on day three. “No more ‘weather flights’ along the border.”
Moscow’s response came through official and back channels simultaneously. Publicly, they denounced Lithuania’s “reckless manipulation of global financial systems.” Privately, through diplomatic intermediaries: We see what you’ve built. Impressive. But participants can be eliminated.
The attack came at dawn on Saturday. A swarm of small drones, each carrying just enough explosive to disable single pieces of infrastructure. They moved in coordinated waves, targeting power distribution nodes feeding Lithuania’s mining network. Too small for air defense, too numerous for manual interdiction.
Kamile had been tracking the approach since 4 AM. “Forty-seven contacts. Military-grade navigation. They’re not trying to kill anyone—just dark our nodes.”
“Can you jam them?”
“Maybe half. But that’ll burn our electronic warfare capabilities.”
Auste stared at the tactical display, red dots converging on months of careful preparation. “Do it.”
The counterstrike was beautiful and terrible. Kamile’s electronic warfare suite sent cascading failures through the drone swarm’s networks. Navigation systems locked up, collision avoidance inverted. Most drones simply fell from the sky. Others crashed into each other in spiralling tangles of carbon fibre.
But not all. Seven reached their targets, taking out substations with surgical precision. Hash rate dropped twelve percent in thirty seconds.
“They know we can hurt them, we know they can hurt us,” Matas said quietly. “Who blinks first?”
Auste was already moving toward the primary control station. “Neither.”
Her hand hovered over a switch never used—manual override for their core facility. For months, they’d kept their primary installation at minimal power, maintaining operational security. But the vault’s deepest chamber held next-generation mining hardware. Quantum-resistant ASICs cooled by liquid nitrogen, their computational power measured in exahashes. Enough to briefly dominate Bitcoin’s global hash rate.
“If we flip this,” Kamile said, “we’re making a statement every intelligence service will notice.”
“Good. Time they paid attention.”
She flipped the switch. Lithuania’s hash rate exploded, rocketing past every mining pool in the Northern Hemisphere. The blockchain itself became a broadcast signal, proof transmitted to every node worldwide that something unprecedented was happening in this small Baltic nation.
Within hours, Russian mining facilities began shutting down. The cost of competing had become prohibitive—profit margins evaporated as network difficulty spiked beyond sustainable levels. State-sponsored operations hemorrhaged money with every attempted block. The drones stopped flying.
In border towns, people gathered around displays showing hash rate climbing steadily upward. Children watched their country’s computational power exceed entire continents. Grandparents whispered about the strange mathematics of freedom. The official response came through diplomatic channels: Your point is made. Stand down.
Auste’s reply was shorter: No. The standoff lasted eighteen days. Lithuania maintained computational dominance while Russian forces remained frozen on the border, unwilling to advance against a target that had proven its ability to impose economic costs through pure mathematics.
When Russian armor finally began withdrawing, it wasn’t because of diplomatic pressure or military deterrence. It was because the math had spoken, and the message was clear: attacking Lithuania would cost more than could ever be gained. Six months later, Auste stood in the same root cellar where the crisis began, watching displays showing steady hash rates and normal latency. The farming equipment had moved back upstairs; the vault now served purely as a data center.
“Seventeen nations want to adopt the model,” Kamile reported.
“Let them. But they’ll need to build their own consensus.”
Because the real secret wasn’t in hardware or software. It wasn’t clever engineering or coordination protocols. The secret was simpler: ordinary people willing to transform their homes into defense network nodes, trusting mathematics more than government promises.
That couldn’t be replicated by copying specifications. It required consensus not just among machines, but among humans willing to stake their futures on mathematical proof. The mining rigs hummed in their chambers, processing blocks and securing transactions in a chain that now included Lithuania’s sovereignty as a cryptographically verified fact. Above ground, the farmhouse looked the same as always—slate roof, weathered shingles, a barn leaning toward the setting sun.
But beneath the soil, where Soviet shells had once left craters, they had built something the world was learning to understand. Not just a defense network, but proof that consensus could be more powerful than coercion. That in an age where trust moved at the speed of mathematics, a small nation willing to stake everything on computational proof could stand against forces that had once seemed irresistible.
The blockchain didn’t lie. And sometimes, in a world full of deceptions, truth itself was the most powerful weapon of all.
150 sats \ 1 reply \ @rafa0x0 14h
This hit hard in the best way. It’s wild how the story blends old trauma with future tech so naturally like, a grandmother’s memories of Soviet boots and a granddaughter mining blocks to defend sovereignty. The idea of decentralization becoming not just economic resistance but national defense? That’s chilling, and somehow totally believable.
What stuck with me most wasn’t even the hardware or the strategy it was the people. Ordinary citizens turning stoves, car batteries, even churches into parts of a living, breathing defense grid. No guns, no flags, just math and willpower. Honestly, it made me wonder if we’ve been underestimating what Bitcoin and proof-of-work could mean this whole time.
reply
Really glad it hit home and broadened your view of how Bitcoin could be used as a means to defend people in the future. I thought it was an important use case of Bitcoin and its ability to shift from kinetic warfare to cyber.
If you haven’t read or heard Jason Lowery’s Softwar idea that inspired this story, I highly recommend checking it out. This is his TED Talk worth watching: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=spDS7q6uRkY
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @RamPl 5h
This story is absolutely mind-blowing. A future where national defense isn't built on tanks or missiles, but on proof-of-work and the collective will of ordinary people. Turning homes, churches, and schools into mining nodes as a deterrent strategy is both brilliant and deeply symbolic. The human details grandmothers feeding biomass rigs, kids setting up nodes make it feel real and powerful. "The blockchain doesn’t lie" becomes more than a phrase; it becomes a doctrine of resistance. This isn’t just fiction, it’s a political and technological manifesto wrapped in storytelling. A vision of defense based on math and consensus, not violence. Inspiring, bold, and honestly… maybe prophetic. The age of digital resistance might come sooner than we think.
reply