pull down to refresh

Maximum Sats you will hold in an LN custodial wallet?
205 sats \ 16 comments \ @Coinsreporter 12h lightning
I understand it's a bit subjective because risk tolerance and utility for everyone is different. But as you know factors like moving LN to On chain is not so cheap and for some or the other reason we sometimes use them.
Here I wanna know or reach a consensus for a number which most stackers say is an upper limit say "enough is enough" to hold Sats in a custodial LN wallet.
Here are your options...
Upto 50K Sats21.1%
Upto 100k Sats21.1%
Upto 200k Sats21.1%
Upto 500k Sats15.8%
Upto 1 Million Sats0.0%
More than 1 Million Sats10.5%
Not at all10.5%
19 votes \ 1 day left
write
preview
related posts
20 sats \ 5 replies \ @justin_shocknet 9h
Self-custody doesn't become economically viable until 200k or so minimum, 500k more realistically. That's still a very low bar for instant settlement and onboarding.
Pretty sad that there's so many fake L2's and scam wallets poisoning the ecosystem over what amounts to a de minimis service credit.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Coinsreporter OP 9h
Thanks. Any recommendation for self-custodial wallets?
reply
20 sats \ 3 replies \ @justin_shocknet 9h
Run a lightning.pub then connect shockwallet to it
You'll then be the custodian, invite friends family customers etc
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Coinsreporter OP 9h
I'm not a technical guy to understand code and the process. A simple wallet that gives me control over my funds should be enough for me.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @justin_shocknet 9h
You can use shockwallet in boostrap mode for the simpler UX immediately. Eventually, once your balance is viable, it'll spin up a cloud node behind the scenes with full automation, enabling you to invite people to share access to it. Invites are just an nprofile that connect the wallet to the node over Nostr.
This spreads the inevitable costs around, but keeps the trust local within families/social circles/small businesses.
It's already pretty simple if you want to do this, if you can buy a linux VPS and copy paste literally one line of code you're good to go.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter OP 9h
Thanks. I'll give it a try.
reply on another page
171 sats \ 1 reply \ @beameduplol 10h
Personally I see no point to using a custodial Lightning wallet when a wallet like Pheonix exists. You have your own seedphrase, and there is no BS attached to it. Just receive and send. Notes feature for convenience, that's it, no?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Msd0457890 6h
I also use it and have my channel, with plans to increase my liquidity, but I also use different LN wallets.
reply
20 sats \ 5 replies \ @denlillaapan 9h
voted for 200k since I'm OK holding up to about 100k each on Alby and Primal. But even that is pushing it... very iffy, very maximum... and I'm likely to withdraw/move well before I hit that maximum
reply
33 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 9h
Alby is non-custodial
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @denlillaapan 8h
um yes, fine... I suppose? It's all very confusing and I have some keys and backups blah-blah but my confidence is actually being able to recover is nooowhereeee near e.g. Phoenix or hardwallets.
...so I'll count it anyway
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 8h
I have some keys and backups
If you think you have sats on Alby but did not setup Alby Hub, you don't have sats on Alby. They turned into credits on Jan 3, 2025:
9. Fee Credits If you failed to connect your Alby Account with self-custodial wallet such as Alby Hub, you will be unable to send and/or receive any transfers. As of January 3, 2025, all funds stored in your Alby Account before that date were added to your account as free credits. [...]
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 7h
yes, I set that up, thank you very much. That's what I said above
P.S.: it was a whole mess and I was very mad, as you can imagine
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter OP 9h
Appreciate the honesty. Thanks for your vote.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @hasherstacker 11h
Maximum would be 21k sats. But normally I keep less than 10k in a Lightning Network account. With the self-custodial wallets already working perfectly fine, I wouldn't let custodial service hold more sats than I can afford to lose.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 11h
related #454517
reply