pull down to refresh

In 1883, when the Pendleton Act was passed, creating the US civil service, it must have seemed like no big deal. The forgotten Chester A. Arthur was the president. The fear of being assassinated like his predecessor James Garfield convinced him to back the legislation. The case for passage: government needs professionals with institutional knowledge. Technicians were changing the world, so why not government too?
Science and engineering were the rage – electricity, steel bridges, telegraphic communications, internal combustion, photography – so surely public affairs needed the same level of expertise. Who could deny that civil service could do a better job than the cousins and business partners of professional politicians?
That’s how it started. What was once called government of, by, and for the people was derided as the hopelessly corrupt “spoils system,” a phrase that reflected genius marketing. So it was overthrown in favor of “merit-based” hiring in the executive, a staff not yet permanent or huge, but the proverbial camel now had its nose under the tent. …
From 2020 to 2023, with continued fallout today, the administrative state that had long ruled out of the public eye reached deep into the private affairs of every American. It closed the schools, churches, and businesses. It issued stay-at-home orders. It kidnapped family members into medical institutions, allowing no contact with family. It then mandated the injection of multitudes with an experimental shot that achieved nothing but left many harmed and others dead.
It is a measure of the arrogance and perceived hegemony of this machine – which extends from agencies to corporations to academia and the nonprofit sector – that so many within its ranks believe they could get away with all these outrages without consequence. Public rage followed, expressing itself in every possible way and demanding change. That change has begun. The conditions are in place for a much more dramatic change, which could happen later or possibly sooner.
The intricate networks of influence, graft, and quid pro quo, and surreptitious pillaging of the people’s resources and power, believed itself to be invulnerable, somewhat like the rulers of the old Soviet empire in the months before it fell apart. Every old regime has believed itself to be secure up to the moments when its leaders seek sanctuary and its minions flee to the hills.
With the Covid response, the administrative state got over its skis, bit off more than it could chew, jumped the shark, pulled out the wrong Jenga block, or whatever other cliche you want to choose. It is the precipitating event, the event that exposed the whole. One is reminded of Mikhail Gorbachev’s war on vodka, which did more than Glasnost or Perestroika to end the regime and undermine the last shred of credibility of the party’s rule.
We’ve wondered for many years what the revolution would look like when it came home. We got a glimpse of this last week, when iPhone cameras recorded thousands of State Department employees carrying their belongings out in bankers’ boxes out the front doors of the palace that had long been their home. Live by administrative edicts; die by them.
Economics, what economics do we see here, you ask. This is the economics of the looting classes that are taking your resources through coercion of the political means. They are also embedding into the private enterprise sphere through the revolving door of the regulatory agencies and their experts. Instead of your choice of satisfying your priorities, they impose their choices for your life on you! This is raw economics, it is praxeology and the state and its experts really have no place in it for our happiness. Good riddance to bad …….
I saw someone posting the recent growth trajectory of the State Department. As fun as those layoffs are, they're but a drop in the bucket of Terror War bureaucratic bloat.
reply
As fun as those layoffs are, they're but a drop in the bucket of Terror War bureaucratic bloat.
Yes, but there is always the first step in the trip of a thousand miles. Perhaps the big step was getting SCOTUS to admit that the administrative state was illegitimate, in the first place, and that the Executive can organize and reorganize the executive branch agencies under his authority, in the second place. Civil service is not looking like the hot road to riches that it was looking before, is it? They might actually have to start working for a change.
reply
the Executive can organize and reorganize the executive branch agencies under his authority
That's a little more than the courts did here. They allowed the layoffs to go forward because the executive order included language that directed the agencies to do them lawfully. There's still an understanding that the executive needs permission from congress to make significant changes.
reply
Perhaps the executive cannot close down a congressionally mandated agency, but what is stopping him from firing all but the Senate approved secretary and putting said secretary in an office in a closet? The agency remains, the mandate remains but the technocratic staff is gone!
reply
It's because Congress also allocates funds to be spent and mandates functions to be fulfilled.
reply
mandates functions to be fulfilled
Most of the time they don’t seem to clearly mandate very much, but delegate their authority to the agencies. That was not mentioned in the Constitution, as far as I can read it. Delegation of congressional authority is debatable as to whether they can do it or not.